MedPath

Portable Artificial Pancreas Applied for Youth and Adolescents

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Interventions
Device: Open-loop control
Device: Bi-hormonal closed-loop control
Registration Number
NCT05543850
Lead Sponsor
Inreda Diabetic B.V.
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the performance of a bi-hormonal reactive closed-loop system in adolscents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. The percentage of time spent in the target range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L) is the main outcome and will be compared between the bi-hormonal closed-loop system and the current treatment of the patients. Also, safety parameters, pharmacodynamics and patient reported outcomes (expectations, trust and treatment satisfaction scores) are compared.

This study is a monocenter, randomized, cross-over trial with 20 subjects. The subjects will be randomized to receive either the open-loop therapy or the closed-loop therapy for the first two-week study period and switch to the alternate treatment with at least two weeks in between.

Detailed Description

Background of the study:

Inreda Diabetic B.V. (Goor, The Netherlands) developed a bi-hormonal reactive closed loop system to automate glucose regulation (artificial pancreas; AP) in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1. In previous studies, we tested the performance and safety of this bi-hormonal closed-loop system in an outpatient setting in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) for a duration up to 2 weeks, leading to CE-marking of the system. The device is currently intended for insulin-dependent adult patients with diabetes. However, there is great need to improve glycaemic control in youth and adolescents with diabetes.

Objective of the study:

The main objective of this study is to determine the performance of the closed-loop system in adolescents with T1DM. Secondary objectives include: to assess the safety of the closed-loop system; to determine the time that the closed-loop algorithm is active; and to assess expectations and treatment satisfaction of the closed-loop system.

Study design:

This study is a monocenter randomized cross-over trial.

Study population:

The study population will comprise 20 patients with T1DM, between 12 and 18 years old, not having impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia, and who are treated with insulin therapy for at least 6 months. Patients receiving treatment with multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin injections (CSII), and in addition glucose monitoring using self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG), flash glucose monitoring (FGM) or continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) are included into the study.

Intervention:

The intervention includes 2 weeks of closed-loop control with the artificial pancreas (AP) of Inreda Diabetic. The device uses 2 subcutaneous glucose sensors, 2 subcutaneous infusion sets, and incorporates 2 pumps and a reactive closed-loop algorithm. During 4-6 days before the intervention the patients receive training on the use of the closed-loop system and will start using the device under close supervision. The control arm (open loop treatment) consists of the patient's standard therapy at home for 2 weeks.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

Main study parameter is the percentage of time spent in the target range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L), which will be compared between the open and closed-loop periods for each patient.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Twelve to eighteen years old;
  • Treated with insulin therapy for at least 6 months;
  • Willing and able to sign informed consent or to assent to study participation.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (score ≥ 4) according to Gold and/or Clarke questionnaire[6,7];
  • BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2;
  • Pregnancy and/or breastfeeding;
  • HbA1c > 97 mmol/mol (11.0%);
  • Use of acetaminophen (paracetamol) during the open loop or closed-loop period,as this may influence the sensor glucose measurements;
  • Limited ability to see, hear or feel the alarm signals of the closed-loop system;
  • Unwillingness to act in response to the alarm signals;
  • Living alone during the night during the closed-loop period (the patient may ask someone to stay over temporarily);
  • Expected poor internet connectivity regarding 24/7 tele monitoring;
  • Any condition that the local investigator feels would interfere with trial participation or evaluation of the results.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Open loop controlOpen-loop controlIn this arm, the patients will use their usual diabetes therapy. Additionally, patients will wear a blinded DexcomG6 for data collection during the open loop period.
Bi-hormonal closed-loop controlBi-hormonal closed-loop controlIn this arm, treatment consists of the bi-hormonal closed-loop system. A short acting insulin analogue (Humalog, 3 ml pre-filled cartridge, Eli Lilly) and glucagon (Glucagen, Novo Nordisk; 3.15 ml cartridge Accu-Chek Spirit, Roche) will be administered according to the closed-loop algorithm. Additionally, patients will wear a blinded DexcomG6 for data collection during the closed loop period.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time in range2 weeks

The proportion of time spent in the range of 3.9-10.0 mmol/L in %

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Glycemic variability - Coefficient of variation2 weeks

Coefficient of variation (standard deviation divided by the mean) in %

Median glucose concentration during the day (6AM - 12PM)2 weeks

Median glucose concentration in mmol/L during the day (6AM - 12PM)

Time in hypoglycemia 22 weeks

The proportion of time spent in hypoglycemia (\<3.0 mmol/L) in %

Median glucose concentration2 weeks

Median glucose concentration in mmol/L

Time in hypoglycemia 12 weeks

The proportion of time spent in hypoglycemia (\<3.9 mmol/L) in %

Time in hyperglycemia 22 weeks

The proportion of time spent in hyperglycemia (\>13.9 mmol/L) in %

Time in hyperglycemia 12 weeks

The proportion of time spent in hyperglycemia (\>10.0 mmol/L) in %

Mean glucose concentration2 weeks

Mean glucose concentration in mmol/L

Mean glucose concentration during the day2 weeks

Mean glucose concentration in mmol/L during the day (6AM - 12PM)

Time spent in hyperglycemia during the night2 weeks

Time spent in hyperglycemia (\>10.0 mmol/L) during the night (12PM - 6AM) in %

Time spent in euglycemia during the day2 weeks

Time spent in euglycemia (\<3.9 mmol/L and \<10 mmol/L) during the day (6AM - 12PM) in %

Algorithm active time2 weeks

Time that the closed-loop algorithm is active in %

Glycemic variability - Interquartile range2 weeks

Interquartile range in mmol/L

Mean glucose concentration during the night (12PM - 6AM)2 weeks

Mean glucose concentration in mmol/L during the night (12PM - 6AM)

Median glucose concentration during the night (12PM - 6AM)2 weeks

Median glucose concentration in mmol/L during the night (12PM - 6AM)

Time spent in hypoglycemia during the night2 weeks

Time spent in hypoglycemia (\<3.9 mmol/L) during the night (12PM - 6AM) in %

Time spent in euglycemia during the night2 weeks

Time spent in euglycemia (\<3.9 mmol/L and \<10 mmol/L) during the night (12PM - 6AM) in %

Time spent in hypoglycemia during the day2 weeks

Time spent in hypoglycemia (\<3.9 mmol/L) during the day (6AM - 12PM) in %

Time spent in hyperglycemia during the day2 weeks

Time spent in hyperglycemia (\>10.0 mmol/L) during the day (6AM - 12PM) in %

Expectations2 weeks

INSPIRE questionnaire (only for closed loop)

Trust2 weeks

TAS questionnaire (only for closed loop)

Satisfaction2 weeks

DTSQ questionnaire (for open loop and closed loop)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Rijnstate Ziekenhuis

🇳🇱

Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath