MedPath

The Effects of Interventions Aiming at Optimizing Expectations and Inducing Positive Emotions After an Acute Stressor

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Healthy Participants
Interventions
Behavioral: Writing task
Registration Number
NCT02848014
Lead Sponsor
Philipps University Marburg Medical Center
Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to determine whether a short psychological intervention aiming at optimizing expectations is able to foster positive emotions and whether an intervention inducing positive emotions is able improve participants' expectations. Furthermore, the investigators will examine whether both interventions are effective in buffering the stress response after an acute stressor in a healthy sample compared to a control condition.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
74
Inclusion Criteria
  • fluent in German language
Exclusion Criteria
  • chronic disease
  • mental disease
  • the evening before the day of the experiment until end of the experiment (the next day): caffeine, alcohol, intensive physical exercise, chewing gum
  • acute hay fever
  • current intake of psychotropic medication

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
ExpectationWriting taskParticipants are asked to think and write about ways how they can positively influence/control the stress during stress induction. They also can think of strategies they used in their past. The purpose of this arm is to improve participants' personal control expectations.
ControlWriting taskParticipants in this group are asked to do a neutral writing task. The task is to write a protocol of yesterday's to-dos.
EmotionWriting taskParticipants in this group are asked to write a gratitude-letter to a person they want to thank. The purpose of this arm is to foster positive emotions.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in personal control expectation (Item of the Brief IPQ)Pre-intervention (baseline; T0) vs. Post-intervention (25 minutes after baseline assessment; T1)
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Subjective stress ratingsdirectly after completing the stress induction (approximately 50 minutes after baseline assessment; T2)

Questionnaire items

Change in emotions (PANAS)Pre-intervention (baseline; T0) vs. Post-intervention (25 minutes after baseline assessment; T1)
Change in Cortisol levels (saliva sample)Pre-intervention (baseline; T0) vs.Post-intervention (25 minutes after baseline assessment; T1), directly (T2), 15 min (T3) and 30 min (T4) after stress induction

directly (T2), 15 min (T3) and 30 min (T4) after stress induction = 50 min, 65 min and 80 min after baseline assessment

Change in Alpha-Amylase levels (saliva sample)Pre-intervention (baseline; T0) vs. Post-intervention (25 minutes after baseline assessment; T1), directly (T2), 15 min (T3) and 30 min (T4) after stress induction

directly (T2), 15 min (T3) and 30 min (T4) after stress induction = 50 min, 65 min and 80 min after baseline assessment

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Psychology, Philipps University Marburg

🇩🇪

Marburg, Hessen, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath