The Effects of Interventions Aiming at Optimizing Expectations and Inducing Positive Emotions After an Acute Stressor
- Conditions
- Healthy Participants
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Writing task
- Registration Number
- NCT02848014
- Lead Sponsor
- Philipps University Marburg Medical Center
- Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine whether a short psychological intervention aiming at optimizing expectations is able to foster positive emotions and whether an intervention inducing positive emotions is able improve participants' expectations. Furthermore, the investigators will examine whether both interventions are effective in buffering the stress response after an acute stressor in a healthy sample compared to a control condition.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 74
- fluent in German language
- chronic disease
- mental disease
- the evening before the day of the experiment until end of the experiment (the next day): caffeine, alcohol, intensive physical exercise, chewing gum
- acute hay fever
- current intake of psychotropic medication
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Expectation Writing task Participants are asked to think and write about ways how they can positively influence/control the stress during stress induction. They also can think of strategies they used in their past. The purpose of this arm is to improve participants' personal control expectations. Control Writing task Participants in this group are asked to do a neutral writing task. The task is to write a protocol of yesterday's to-dos. Emotion Writing task Participants in this group are asked to write a gratitude-letter to a person they want to thank. The purpose of this arm is to foster positive emotions.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in personal control expectation (Item of the Brief IPQ) Pre-intervention (baseline; T0) vs. Post-intervention (25 minutes after baseline assessment; T1)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Subjective stress ratings directly after completing the stress induction (approximately 50 minutes after baseline assessment; T2) Questionnaire items
Change in emotions (PANAS) Pre-intervention (baseline; T0) vs. Post-intervention (25 minutes after baseline assessment; T1) Change in Cortisol levels (saliva sample) Pre-intervention (baseline; T0) vs.Post-intervention (25 minutes after baseline assessment; T1), directly (T2), 15 min (T3) and 30 min (T4) after stress induction directly (T2), 15 min (T3) and 30 min (T4) after stress induction = 50 min, 65 min and 80 min after baseline assessment
Change in Alpha-Amylase levels (saliva sample) Pre-intervention (baseline; T0) vs. Post-intervention (25 minutes after baseline assessment; T1), directly (T2), 15 min (T3) and 30 min (T4) after stress induction directly (T2), 15 min (T3) and 30 min (T4) after stress induction = 50 min, 65 min and 80 min after baseline assessment
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Department of Psychology, Philipps University Marburg
🇩🇪Marburg, Hessen, Germany