跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03219034
NCT03219034已完成不适用

Mid-line Traction Versus Bilateral Thrust Oral Appliances: A Trial to Determine Superiority for Improving Upper Airway Function and Sleep Quality

Texas A&M University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 62 人开始时间: 2017年10月10日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
62
试验地点
2
主要终点
Respiratory Event Index (REI) at T2

研究概览

简要总结

This study will compare the effectiveness of the two leading oral appliances (OAs) designs for the treatment of severe obstructive sleep apnea in overweight adults. The effectiveness of OAs has come under question since different designs are combined in evaluating treatment efficacy, for example when comparing them to continuous positive airway pressure Due to the wide range of reported efficacy (53 to 90%), it is of great value to identify the most effective design to guide sleep practitioners and patients.

详细描述

The two prominent oral appliances used in treating obstructive sleep apnea differ in their designs, mid-line traction versus bilateral thrust. From a clinical perspective, it is important to know which design is superior and should be the 'treatment of choice' for improving airway function and sleep quality. These two designs differ in their protrusive mechanisms that are categorized in general under four main types: bilateral compression, bilateral thrust, midline compression and mid-line traction. Although the two designs considered in this proposal have undergone the most rigorous testing individually, well controlled 'head-to-head' trials as proposed here have not been conducted to determine their efficacy within a single test population.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • OSA PSG or PG diagnosed adults within 1 year
  • Currently treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)
  • AHI ≥ >30 events/hour of sleep
  • Two or more OSA symptoms (snoring, witnessed apnea or daytime hypersomnolence complaint)
  • At least 8 teeth per arch to support either OA device
  • Central and mixed apnea index <5 events/hour
  • Mallampati score from I to III
  • Palatine tonsils - grade 0, 1, or 2
  • Consent to study's timeline
  • Willingness to wear home sleep test apparatus for at least 4 nights
  • Willingness to wear an oral appliance every night for 8 weeks
  • Willingness to pick up and return home sleep test kits as needed

排除标准

  • Cardiac & pulmonary disease (e.g., congestive heart failure, severe arrhythmias, COPD);
  • Central sleep apnea;
  • Comorbidities with other sleep disorders
  • No active TMD or jaw muscle pain
  • Morphological airway abnormalities
  • Pre-existing difficulty swallowing; throat or neck related health issues
  • Endocrine dysfunction
  • Severe psychiatric disorders;
  • Previous OA therapy; ENT surgery
  • Restrictions in jaw opening
  • Pregnancy / breast feeding or intent to become pregnant during the study
  • Inability to apply the sleep recorders

结局指标

主要结局

Respiratory Event Index (REI) at T2

时间窗: 4 weeks

Number of apneas and hypopneas (respiratory events) per hour of recording; REI was reported instead of AHI, as it is a more appropriate measure for home sleep testing.

次要结局

  • Stable Sleep Percent(4 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Emet D. Schneiderman, PhD

Professor Dr.

Texas A&M University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验