NCT05848882CompletedNot Applicable
Comparison Between Removable Devices in Palatal Expansion: a Randomized Open Label Clinical Trial
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- University of L'Aquila
- Enrollment
- 70
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Palatal first premolars width
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial si to compare two removable devices used to treat the transversal discrepancies in growing patients.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- the efficacy of the two devices in the palatal expansion
- the neuromuscolar effects developed on the stomatognatic system Participants will be instructed in the use and maintenance of the devices and will be checked every 15-30 days for one year.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 9 Years to 15 Years (Child)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •skeletal class I relationship, molar class I relationship; complete eruption of upper first premolars ; presence of unilateral or bilateral cross bite (falling within grade 3 IOTN index)
Exclusion Criteria
- •IOTN index >4; presence of temporomandibular disorders, epilepsy, systemic diseases, periodontal disease, absence of written informed consent signed by parents/legal guardians
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Palatal first premolars width
Time Frame: 12 months
To compare the palatal first premolars width in three times
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Eleonora Ortu
Principal Investigator
University of L'Aquila
Study Sites (2)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparing Reduction With ESD- Versus APC-TOReRoux-en-y Anastomosis SiteWeight GainObesityNCT06131281Stephen Firkins70
Completed
Not Applicable
Trial on Oral Appliance Design for Improving Upper Airway Function and Sleep QualityObstructive Sleep ApneaNCT03219034Texas A&M University62
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
Effectiveness of Modified Functional Appliance With ExpanderClass II MalocclusionNCT06116500University of Baghdad48
Enrolling By Invitation
Phase 2
Maxillary Canine Retraction Assisted With Micro-osteoperforations Versus Injectable Platelet Rich FibrinEffects of Movement of Teeth Assiste Wit MOPS and I-prfNCT05960825Al-Azhar University18
Recruiting
Not Applicable
5Fr Bipolar Electrode vs. Conical Optical 5Fr Fibers for Dual Wave-length Diode Laser for Hysteroscopic PolypectomyEndometrial PolypNCT06526962University of Cagliari214
