Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02931487
NCT02931487CompletedNot Applicable

Restoring Emotion Regulation Networks in Depression Vulnerability: An Experimental Study Applying an Attention Bias Modification Procedure

University of Oslo2 sites in 1 country134 target enrollmentStarted: May 2015Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
134
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
BOLD response in prefrontal cortical regions

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Selective biases in attention can be modified by a simple computerized technique: The Attention Bias Modification Task (ABM) pioneered by MacLeod et al. Cognitive biases may be one reason depression recurs, and altering these biases should reduce risk of recurrence. Recently, evidence has supported this hypothesis . The mechanisms by which ABM works are not well understood. More research is needed to explore how altering an implicit attentional bias can lead to changes in subjective mood. One possible explanation is that positive attentional biases are an important component of explicit methods of emotion regulation. The ability to effectively regulate one's emotions is a fundamental component of mental health and this ability is impaired in depression. It has also been shown that recovered depressed people spontaneously show a more dysfunctional pattern of emotion regulation as compared to never depressed controls. Supporting this, growing evidence implicates dysregulation of a medial/orbitofrontal circuit in mood disorders. This circuit includes the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex, the ventral striatum, the ventral pallidum and medial thalamus. Components of this circuit are reciprocally connected with the amygdala, which is implicated in emotional processing in the healthy brain and dysregulated in depression. Negative emotion processing biases depend on both enhanced "bottom-up" responses to emotionally salient stimuli and reduces "top-down" cognitive control mechanisms, required to suppress responses to emotionally salient but task irrelevant information. Cognitive reappraisal and distancing are common strategies to down- or upregulate emotional responses. Reappraisal is an emotion regulation strategy that involves reinterpretation and changing the way one thinks about an event or stimulus with the goal of changing its affective impact. Distancing is a type of reappraisal that involves creating mental space between oneself and the emotional event in order to see things from a different, less self-focused perspective. It has been shown that distancing is a strategy that people can improve at over time compared to reinterpretation. The neural systems which support the explicit regulation of emotion have previously been characterized and include both lateral- and prefrontal cortex. This frontal activity is predicted to downregulate limbic circuitry involving the amygdala during passive viewing of emotional salient stimuli.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Currently no-depressed subjects with a history of major depression.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Current or past neurological illness, bipolar disorder, psychosis or drug addiction.

Arms & Interventions

Attentional Bias Modification

Experimental

ABM dot-probe task with image stimuli (faces) of three valences: positive (happy), neutral, or negative (angry and fearful). In the ABM condition, probes were located behind positive stimuli in 87 % of the trials (valid trials), as opposed to 13% with probes located behind the more negative stimuli (invalid trials). Consequently, participants should implicitly learn to deploy their attention toward positive stimuli, and in this way develop a more positive AB when completing the task.

Intervention: Attentional Bias Modification (Behavioral)

Sham comparator

Sham Comparator

Sham condition without modification of attentional bias. These trials are identical in structure to the ABM trials with the exception that target probes replaced negative and positive images with equal frequency.

Intervention: Sham Comparator (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

BOLD response in prefrontal cortical regions

Time Frame: Two weeks after after ABM-training

Stronger fMRI BOLD response in prefrontal cortical regions in ABMT compared to neutral AMB placebo condition.

Secondary Outcomes

  • BOLD response within the amygdala(Two weeks after ABM-training)
  • DTI(Two weeks after ABM-training)
  • RSFC(Two weeks after ABM-training)
  • 5-HTTLPR + A>G polymorphic variation divided by the triallelic functional "high expressive" versus "low expressive" genotype will moderate the impact from ABMT as measured by whole brain BOLD responses.(Two weeks after ABM-training)
  • BDNF(Two week after ABM-training)
  • Serotonergic cumulative genetic score and fMRI(Two weeks after ABM-training)
  • Serotonergic cumulative genetic score and morphompetry(Two weeks after ABM-training)
  • Serotonergic cumulative genetic score and fMRI and DTI(Two weeks after ABM-training)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Nils Inge Landrø

Professor Dr. philos

University of Oslo

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Restoring Emotion Regulation Networks in... | Clinical Trial