MedPath

Quantitative D-dimer Level and Anticoagulant Therapy in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Early Phase 1
Completed
Conditions
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT03963336
Lead Sponsor
Fayoum University
Brief Summary

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a syndrome characterized by elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) of unknown etiology.

The investigators aim to study the quantitative D-dimer level and the role of anticoagulant therapy in the absence of occlusive sinus thrombosis in IIH patients.

Detailed Description

24 patients with IIH according to the modified Dandy criteria were enrolled. Headache impact test (HIT6), ophthalmological assessment including Frisen classification for papilledema, visual acuity, visual field by perimetry, and visual evoked potentials were performed to the patients.

Serum quantitative D-dimer level was measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique for the patients and for 24 healthy matched controls.

Patients were divided into two groups: group (A) received acetazolamide and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in a prophylactic dose for 2 weeks while group (B) received acetazolamide only. Both groups continued the acetazolamide 1-2g/day for 6 months.

The investigators followed-up the patients after one and six months later through the HIT6 test and the ophthalmological assessment.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
48
Inclusion Criteria
  • IIH patients of both sexes fulfilling the modified Dandy criteria
Exclusion Criteria
  • disturbed conscious level, focal neurological signs, seizures, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis or stenosis, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, malignancy, and acute nephritic syndrome.
  • Patients with signs of disseminated intravascular coagulopathy and septic sinus thrombosis
  • patients with a history of cerebral granuloma or infection, cerebrovascular stroke, head trauma or surgery.
  • pregnant females or those who terminated their pregnancy in the last four weeks were also excluded.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group ALMWH12 IIH patients for whom serum D-dimer was assessed by ELISA.They received acetazolamide and anticoagulant LMWH in the prophylactic dose for 2 weeks then continued on acetazolamide. Follow up after 1 and 6 months through HIT6 test and ophthalmological assessment (visual acuity, Frisen classification for papilledema, visual field, and visual evoked potentials)
Group Aacetazolamide12 IIH patients for whom serum D-dimer was assessed by ELISA.They received acetazolamide and anticoagulant LMWH in the prophylactic dose for 2 weeks then continued on acetazolamide. Follow up after 1 and 6 months through HIT6 test and ophthalmological assessment (visual acuity, Frisen classification for papilledema, visual field, and visual evoked potentials)
Group Bacetazolamide12 IIH patients for whom serum D-dimer was assessed by ELISA. They received acetazolamide only. Follow up after 1 and 6 months through HIT6 test and ophthalmological assessment (visual acuity, Frisen classification for papilledema, visual field, and visual evoked potentials)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
serum quantitative D-dimerBaseline assessment

higher serum D-dimer levels will be detected in IIH patients of both groups compared to controls

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
HIT6 score1 and 6 months

The HIT6 score will improve in both groups (A and B) after receiving the treatment (either acetazolamide or LMWH)

Visual acuity (Log Mar)6 months

Visual acuity will improve in both groups (A and B) after receiving the treatment (either acetazolamide or LMWH)

Visual field (Perimetry)6 months

Visual field will improve in both groups (A and B) after receiving the treatment (either acetazolamide or LMWH)

Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP)6 months

VEP will improve in both groups (A and B) after receiving the treatment (either acetazolamide or LMWH)

Frisen classification for papilledema6 months

papilledema will improve in both groups (A and B) after receiving the treatment (either acetazolamide or LMWH)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Fayoum University Hospital

🇪🇬

Fayoum, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath