Quantitative D-dimer Level and Anticoagulant Therapy in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
- Conditions
- Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
- Interventions
- Drug: LMWH
- Registration Number
- NCT03963336
- Lead Sponsor
- Fayoum University
- Brief Summary
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a syndrome characterized by elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) of unknown etiology.
The investigators aim to study the quantitative D-dimer level and the role of anticoagulant therapy in the absence of occlusive sinus thrombosis in IIH patients.
- Detailed Description
24 patients with IIH according to the modified Dandy criteria were enrolled. Headache impact test (HIT6), ophthalmological assessment including Frisen classification for papilledema, visual acuity, visual field by perimetry, and visual evoked potentials were performed to the patients.
Serum quantitative D-dimer level was measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique for the patients and for 24 healthy matched controls.
Patients were divided into two groups: group (A) received acetazolamide and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in a prophylactic dose for 2 weeks while group (B) received acetazolamide only. Both groups continued the acetazolamide 1-2g/day for 6 months.
The investigators followed-up the patients after one and six months later through the HIT6 test and the ophthalmological assessment.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 48
- IIH patients of both sexes fulfilling the modified Dandy criteria
- disturbed conscious level, focal neurological signs, seizures, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis or stenosis, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, malignancy, and acute nephritic syndrome.
- Patients with signs of disseminated intravascular coagulopathy and septic sinus thrombosis
- patients with a history of cerebral granuloma or infection, cerebrovascular stroke, head trauma or surgery.
- pregnant females or those who terminated their pregnancy in the last four weeks were also excluded.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group A LMWH 12 IIH patients for whom serum D-dimer was assessed by ELISA.They received acetazolamide and anticoagulant LMWH in the prophylactic dose for 2 weeks then continued on acetazolamide. Follow up after 1 and 6 months through HIT6 test and ophthalmological assessment (visual acuity, Frisen classification for papilledema, visual field, and visual evoked potentials) Group A acetazolamide 12 IIH patients for whom serum D-dimer was assessed by ELISA.They received acetazolamide and anticoagulant LMWH in the prophylactic dose for 2 weeks then continued on acetazolamide. Follow up after 1 and 6 months through HIT6 test and ophthalmological assessment (visual acuity, Frisen classification for papilledema, visual field, and visual evoked potentials) Group B acetazolamide 12 IIH patients for whom serum D-dimer was assessed by ELISA. They received acetazolamide only. Follow up after 1 and 6 months through HIT6 test and ophthalmological assessment (visual acuity, Frisen classification for papilledema, visual field, and visual evoked potentials)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method serum quantitative D-dimer Baseline assessment higher serum D-dimer levels will be detected in IIH patients of both groups compared to controls
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method HIT6 score 1 and 6 months The HIT6 score will improve in both groups (A and B) after receiving the treatment (either acetazolamide or LMWH)
Visual acuity (Log Mar) 6 months Visual acuity will improve in both groups (A and B) after receiving the treatment (either acetazolamide or LMWH)
Visual field (Perimetry) 6 months Visual field will improve in both groups (A and B) after receiving the treatment (either acetazolamide or LMWH)
Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP) 6 months VEP will improve in both groups (A and B) after receiving the treatment (either acetazolamide or LMWH)
Frisen classification for papilledema 6 months papilledema will improve in both groups (A and B) after receiving the treatment (either acetazolamide or LMWH)
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Fayoum University Hospital
🇪🇬Fayoum, Egypt