A Prospective Multicenter Study of Different Surgical Methods for the Treatment of Macular Schisis in High Myopia Based on the Real World

Aier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University1 site in 1 country400 target enrollmentOctober 7, 2019

ConditionsMacular Schisis

Overview

Phase: Not Applicable
Intervention: Not specified
Conditions: Macular Schisis
Sponsor: Aier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University
Enrollment: 400
Locations: 1
Primary Endpoint: retinal thickness of the most significant schisis
Last Updated: 6 years ago

Overview Investigators Eligibility Criteria Outcomes Sites Similar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

In view of the current problem of treating high myopic macular schisis, the main purpose of our study is to find out the most appropriate time of surgical intervention, to compare the effectiveness and safety of various surgical methods in the treatment of high myopic macular schisis, and to find out the advantages and disadvantages of each surgical method in the treatment of MF. As well as the outcomes and complications of long-term follow-up.

Registry

clinicaltrials.gov

Start Date

October 7, 2019

End Date

June 7, 2022

Last Updated

6 years ago

Study Type

Interventional

Study Design

Factorial

Sex

All

Investigators

Sponsor

Aier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University

Responsible Party

Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

•diopter ≤-6.00D or axial length ≥ 26.00mm;
•OCT showed macular schisis with or without macular retinal detachment;
•agreed to participate in this project and signed informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

•OCT confirmed full-thickness macular hole with or without macular retinal detachment；
•submacular active or inactive CNV;
•previous vitreoretinal surgery and anti-glaucoma surgery；
•with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, ocular trauma, glaucoma, corneal opacity and other ophthalmic diseases;
•complicated with severe systemic disease can not tolerate surgery or follow-up;
•do not agree to participate the project or disagree with the follow-up.