MedPath

Effect of Segmentation Techniques (Manual Versus Semiautomatic) on the Accuracy of the Reconstructed Mandibular Condyle Using CBCT

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Segmentation Techniques
Registration Number
NCT05435417
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

Effect of Segmentation Techniques (Manual versus Semiautomatic) on the Accuracy of the Reconstructed Mandibular Condyle using CBCT

Detailed Description

It will be used to segment the mandibular condyle and asses its volumetric and linear measurements. Therefore, the accuracy of the segmentation techniques of the mandibular condyle will be determined

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
29
Inclusion Criteria
  • Intact dry human skulls and mandibles.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Presence of fracture, pathological lesions, or skeletal deformities in the condylar area.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Linear assessment of the condylesone month

Linear measurements will be calculated in millimeters by Built-in measuring tool (ruler) in the software + digital caliper on the dry mandibles

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Volumetric assessment of the condylesone month

For volumetric measurements, the volume of the segmented condyle, either by manual or semiautomatic segmentation technique, will be automatically calculated by the software. Volumetric measurements will be calculated in cubic millimeters.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of dentistry, Cairo University

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

Faculty of dentistry, Cairo University
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt
Enas El Saket, PHD degree
Contact
+201001243575
enas_saket@dentistry.cu.edu.eg

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.