Evaluation of Accuracy of Computer Guided Versus Conventional Segmental Sandwich Osteotomy With Immediate Implant Placement in Vertically Deficient Anterior Maxilla

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Sandwich Osteotomy

• Registration Number: NCT04006678
• Lead Sponsor: Cairo University

Brief Summary

In conventional segmental sandwich osteotomy technique the moving the transport segment inferiorly to increase the vertical height causes the segment to move bucco-palatally, increasing the horizontal defect. So using the computer guided in segmental sandwich osteotomy and fixation the transport segment hopefully will reduce the bucco-palatal tipping.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2019-07
• Study Start: 2019-07
• Study First Submitted: 2019-07-01
• Study First Submitted QC: 2019-07-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2019-07-01
• Study First Posted: 2019-07-05
• Last Update Posted: 2019-07-05
• Primary Completion: 2020-06
• Study Completion: 2020-08

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 10

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients with vertically deficient anterior maxillary ridge a minimum 10 mm. height of alveolar bone.
• Patients with medical history that did not hinder implant placement (uncontrolled diabetes) and adequate proper oral hygiene.
• Patients of adequate alveolar bone width.
• Both genders males and females will be included.

Exclusion Criteria

• General contraindications to implant surgery.
• Subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 year before implantation.
• Untreated periodontitis.
• Poor oral hygiene and motivation.
• Uncontrolled diabetes.
• Pregnant or nursing.
• Substance abuse.
• Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
• Severe bruxism or clenching.
• Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised.
• Treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.
• Lack of opposite occluding dentition/prosthesis in the area intended for implant placement.
• Active infection or severe inflammation in the area intended for implant placement.
• Need of bone augmentation procedures at implant placement.
• Unable to open mouth sufficiently to accommodate the surgical tooling.
• Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol could not be properly followed.
• Referred only for implant placement or unable to attend a 5-year follow-up.
• Requiring only single implant-supported crowns.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
bucco - palatal tipping	6 months	calculate the amount of bucco-palaltal tipping of mobilized transport segment after 6 months in mm by cone beam CT between both groups.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
marginal bone loss	6 months	calculate marginal bone loss in mm by cone beam CT between two groups