CTRI/2019/07/019961尚未招募3 期
COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY OF TAMSULOSIN VS SILODOSIN IN THE TREATMENT OF LOWER URETERIC CALCULUS-RANDOMISED CONTROLLED STUDY
ARUNCHAND R0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •a) Unilateral distal ureteric calculus
- •b) Size < 10 mm
- •c) Normal renal parameters (Serum Urea & Serum Creatinine)
- •d) Age 18-60 yrs
排除标准
- •a) Single kidney
- •b) Bilateral ureteric stone
- •c) Mid/upper ureteric calculus
- •d) Renal impairment
- •e) High grade hydroureteronephrosis (Grade III & IV as per Society of Fetal Ultrasound, SFU)
- •f) Any h/o previous endoscopic/ surgical/ ESWL interventions
- •g) Intolerable side-effects (Hypotension) to either tamsulosin/ silodosin
- •h) Evidence of UTI
- •j) Concomitant kidney/bladder stones
- •k) Patients already on any alpha blocker for BPH
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
4 期
TAMSULOSIN VERSUS ALFUZOSIN IN THE TREATMENT OF LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMSCTRI/2020/06/025806ARMED FORCES MEDICAL COLLEGE
已完成
不适用
Effect of tamsulosin and minirin in treatment of BPHBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Hyperplasia of prostateIRCT201205219819N1rologyResearch Center354
招募中
3 期
Silodosin alone versus Tamsulosin with Tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteric stones: A Prospective Randomized Trial.CTRI/2023/06/054090Sun Pharma
尚未招募
不适用
Comparison of Silodosin & tamsulosin in management of prostate enlargementCTRI/2019/11/021996niversity College of Medical Sciences University of Delhi
尚未招募
Unknown
ALPHABET studyOveractive bladder with benign prostatic hyperplasiaOAB BPHJPRN-jRCT1011230058Wada Naoki60