A Comparison Of Dental Arch Analysis Using 3d Digital Scanning Versus Conventional Methods In Children
- Conditions
- Dental Arch Length Analysis
- Registration Number
- NCT07179146
- Lead Sponsor
- Pharos University in Alexandria
- Brief Summary
A crossover study will be conducted on 20 pediatric patients aged 7-11 years. For each participant, the upper and lower study models will be processed using two methods: the conventional method, which involves alginate impressions, and the digital method, which utilizes a 3D intraoral digital scanner (CEREC Omnicam scanner or equivalent). Measurements of arch length, arch width, and arch depth will be taken from both model types using the conventional method with a brass wire and a digital caliper. At the same time, in the scan cast, they will be calculated digitally by 3D shape software. Statistical analysis will be done to compare the results of both methods.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Healthy Children aged 7-11 years old (ASA 1).
- Class I with normal development of occlusion .
- Absence of dental extractions.
- Absence of previous removable or fixed orthodontic treatments.
- Patients with fully erupted permanent first molars.
- Children with Frankel behavioral rating scale 2,3 and 4.
- Delayed erupted 1st permanent molar.
- Teeth with severe rotation.
- Dental agenesis.
- Oligodontia.
- Frankel behavioral rating scale 1.
- Patients with special health care and medically compromised patients.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Subjective outcome 2 months Patient acceptance will be recorded according to Modified Facial scale modified from the Maunuksela et al scale showing the 3 schematic faces representing: (A) satisfaction; (B) indifference; and (C) dissatisfaction, respectively.
Objective Outcome (Measurement) 2 months Arch depth measured in mm
Patient acceptance 2 months Frankl's behavior rating scale will be re-evaluated after each method used. Score 1-4. score 1=definitely positive, score 2=positive,score 3=negative,score 4=definitely negative.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Pharos University in Alexandria
🇪🇬Alexandria, Egypt
Pharos University in Alexandria🇪🇬Alexandria, EgyptNehal Raid Salman, LecturerContact002-01006476228nehal.raid@pua.edu.eg