Physiologic Effects of High Flow Nasal Therapy in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (OPTIFLOW)
- Conditions
- Respiratory Failure
- Interventions
- Procedure: O2standProcedure: CPAPProcedure: Optiflow
- Registration Number
- NCT01056952
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Bordeaux
- Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to assess, in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, the short term physiologic effects of the high flow oxygen nasal therapy (Optiflow), in term of inspiratory muscle effort, gas exchange, comfort and dyspnea
- Detailed Description
The administration of a known concentration of oxygen is an important part of routine care of the patient admitted in intensive care unit for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. A new high flow oxygen delivery system (Fisher and Paykel Health care) has been developed (Optiflow). The system used a heated humidifier and heated breathing circuit via a nasal interface. High flow nasal therapy (Optiflow) is associated with the generation of significant positive airway pressure in healthy volunteers. Positive expiratory pressure may have a number of benefits in respiratory failure which include improved ventilation/perfusion matching with improved oxygenation, reduced airways resistance and reduced work of breathing. Moreover high flow nasal therapy may improve oxygen administration by decreasing oxygen dilution, decreasing death space and using high levels of humidification
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 12
- Acute respiratory insufficiency, defined as the PaO2/FIO2 ratio of 300 mm Hg or less after breathing oxygen
- The presence of lung infiltrates on a posteroanterior chest radiograph
- Face or cranial trauma or surgery
- Patients younger than 18 years
- History of COPD
- Acute respiratory acidosis (defined as a pH <7.30 and a PaCO2 >50 mm Hg)
- Hemodynamic instability with arterial pressure < 90mmHg
- Respiratory instability with PaO2/FiO2<100mmHg
- ventricular arrhythmias
- Excess respiratory secretions.
- Upper gastrointestinal bleeding
- Recent gastric or oesophageal surgery
- Tracheostomy or other airways disorders
- Pneumothorax
- Contraindication of gastric probe insertion
- Impossibility to insert the oesophageal probe
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Optiflow then CPAP O2stand Standard low flow oxygen therapy then High flow oxygen nasal therapy (Optiflow)then Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) Optiflow then CPAP CPAP Standard low flow oxygen therapy then High flow oxygen nasal therapy (Optiflow)then Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) Optiflow then CPAP Optiflow Standard low flow oxygen therapy then High flow oxygen nasal therapy (Optiflow)then Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) CPAP then Optiflow O2stand Standard low flow oxygen therapy then Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)then High flow oxygen nasal therapy (Optiflow) CPAP then Optiflow CPAP Standard low flow oxygen therapy then Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)then High flow oxygen nasal therapy (Optiflow) CPAP then Optiflow Optiflow Standard low flow oxygen therapy then Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)then High flow oxygen nasal therapy (Optiflow)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Inspiratory muscle effort : oesophageal pressure (Poes) and the oesophageal pressure time product (PTPoes) Every 30 minutes for 90 minutes
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Gas exchange :PaO2/FiO2 ratio Every 30 minutes for 90 minutes Comfort assessed using a five-item semi quantitative scale Every 30 minutes for 90 minutes Dyspnea assessed using a visual analogic scale Every 30 minutes for 90 minutes
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Pellegrin Hospital, Recovery Unit
🇫🇷Bordeaux, France