Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/ISRCTN16387615
ISRCTN16387615
Completed
Phase 4

A randomised pragmatic trial comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of Lithium and Quetiapine augmentation in treatment resistant Depression

King’s College London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust0 sites261 target enrollmentFebruary 29, 2016

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
King’s College London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
Enrollment
261
Status
Completed
Last Updated
3 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

2017 Protocol article in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28651526 protocol

Registry
who.int
Start Date
February 29, 2016
End Date
July 22, 2022
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
King’s College London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Current inclusion criteria as of 15/12/2017:
  • 1\. Under the care of a GP and/or adult mental health services
  • 2\. Current episode of depression meeting DSM\-5 criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) – single or recurrent episode
  • 3\. 17\-item HAM\-D score \= 14 – this cut\-off reflects a pragmatic minimum severity of depression as also chosen in comparable studies such as STAR\*D (Rush et al 2006, Trivedi et al 2006\)
  • 4\. Any gender and aged 18 years or over
  • 5\. Meet criteria for treatment resistant depression (Fekadu et al., 2009a; Cleare et al., 2015\): current episode has not responded to at least two antidepressants given for at least 6 weeks at minimum therapeutic dose defined as fluoxetine \=20mg/day, paroxetine \=20mg/day, sertraline \=50mg/day, citalopram \=20mg/day, escitalopram \=10mg/day, venlafaxine \=75mg/day, duloxetine \=60 mg/day, mirtazapine \=15mg/day, tricyclic antidepressant \=125mg/day, and dosage as guided by the national Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines or BNF for any other antidepressant. Please note, relapse whilst on an antidepressant also counts as a failed treatment trial
  • 6\. Current antidepressant treatment has remained unchanged and at, or above, a therapeutic dose for \=6 weeks
  • 7\. Provision of written, informed consent.
  • Inclusion criteria as of 22/11/2016:
  • 1\. Under the care of a GP and/or adult mental health services

Exclusion Criteria

  • Exclusion criteria as of 15/12/2017:
  • 1\. Diagnosis of bipolar disorder (defined as meeting DSM\-5 criteria bipolar 1 or bipolar 2\) on the MINI 7\.0 (as recommended treatments are different for bipolar depression)
  • 2\. Diagnosis of current psychosis (as recommended treatments are different for current psychosis – antidepressants plus antipsychotics is the first\-line treatment recommendation (NICE, 2009; Cleare et al., 2015\)
  • 3\. Adequate use of lithium or quetiapine during the current episode. An adequate dose of lithium is defined as the patient taking lithium for at least 4 weeks at an adequate dose (leading to a documented plasma concentration of \>0\.4mmol/L) and for quetiapine, prescription in the range of 150\-300mg/d for 4 weeks or longer. Or, if the patient has taken an inadequate dose of lithium or quetiapine in the current episode, the patient and clinician are not willing to re\-prescribe/take the medication.
  • 4\. Ongoing use of another atypical antipsychotic (discontinuation will be required before study entry i.e. any time prior to randomisation)
  • 5\. Known contraindication to use of either lithium or quetiapine: known hypersensitivity of lithium or quetiapine or any of their excipients; severe renal insufficiency / impairment; untreated hypothyroidism; severe cardiac disease / insufficiency; low sodium levels e.g. dehydrated patients or those on low sodium diets; Addison’s disease; Brugada syndrome or family history of Brugada syndrome; the rare hereditary inborn errors of metabolism galactosaemia, the Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose\-galactose malabsorption, concomitant administration of cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors; or congenital QT prolongation.
  • 6\. We will not recruit any individual who is currently participating in a clinical trial of an investigational medical product (CTIMP).
  • 7\. Insufficient degree of comprehension or attention to be able to engage in trial procedures.
  • 8\. We will exclude women who are pregnant, actively trying for pregnancy, or currently breastfeeding. This will be based on verbal report of the subject. Otherwise the management will be as appropriate according to standard clinical practice within the context of a pragmatic, open trial, for example adequate contraceptive precautions decided on the clinical judgement of the prescriber.
  • Exclusion criteria as of 22/11/2016:

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing high altitude treatment with current best care in children with Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and asthma within the atopic syndrome by the Wilhelmina Children?s Hospital, Utrecht-Dutch Asthma Centre, DAVOSAtopic dermatitis and asthma within the atopic syndromeSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesAtopic dermatitis
ISRCTN88136485niversity Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) (Netherlands)80
Completed
Not Applicable
Trial comparing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of levetiracetam and zonisamide versus standard treatments for epilepsy: a comparison of Standard And New Antiepileptic DrugsTopic: Medicines for Children Research Network, NeurologicalSubtopic: All Diagnoses, Neurological (all Subtopics)Disease: Nervous system disordersNervous System DiseasesEpilepsy
ISRCTN30294119niversity of Liverpool (UK)1,510
Completed
Not Applicable
A randomized controlled trial of an empowerment intervention for female adolescents with diabetes.DiabetesNutritional, Metabolic, EndocrineType 1 diabetes
ISRCTN57528404Karolinska Institute / Södersjukhuset100
Completed
Not Applicable
Pragmatic, randomised controlled trial assessing the non-Inferiority of counselling and its effectiveness for depressioDepressionModerate and severe depressionMental and Behavioural Disorders
ISRCTN06461651niversity of Sheffield (UK)510
Completed
Not Applicable
World hip trauma evaluation five: a randomised controlled trial comparing cemented and uncemented implants for the treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fracturesHip fractureMusculoskeletal DiseasesFracture of neck of femur
ISRCTN18393176niversity of Oxford1,125