Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04086641
NCT04086641
Completed
N/A

Functional Assessment of High-profile Crossover Feet in People With Syme's Amputation

University of Washington1 site in 1 country5 target enrollmentJuly 22, 2019

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Amputation
Sponsor
University of Washington
Enrollment
5
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Ratio Between Sound and Prosthetic Side Step Lengths
Status
Completed
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the functional differences between two types of foot prostheses for people with ankle disarticulation (Syme's) amputations. The two feet being tested are low- and high-profile feet, with the difference being the latter has an extended keel and attaches to the posterior of the prosthetic socket, rather than the distal end. The hypothesis is that the high-profile foot (i.e., the crossover foot) will lead to functional and biomechanical improvements compared to low-profile feet.

Detailed Description

Syme's prostheses are typically limited to low-profile prosthetic feet due to clearance restrictions below the prosthetic socket. As a result, the functional benefits provided by the long residual limb are mitigated by prosthetic design limitations. Recently, high-profile, posteriorly-attaching crossover feet have been modified for use with people who have Syme's amputation. Crossover feet theoretically improve motion and energy storage-and-return compared to traditional foot options for the Syme's level. Crossover feet also have the potential to broaden the range of high-impact activities that can be performed with a single prosthesis. However, to date there is no empirical evidence that compares functional differences when walking with high-profile crossover feet compared to low-profile feet for people with Syme's amputation. This mixed-method pilot research will use a randomized, controlled within-participants design. Investigators will assess gait biomechanics, self-reported health outcomes, and qualitative interviews to compare relative advantages and disadvantages of traditional low-profile Syme's feet and high-profile crossover feet. This proposed work will create a foundation for future research that examines the potential benefits of crossover feet in people with Syme's amputation. In addition, results from this research will be used clinically to inform prosthetic options for people with limited clearance for distally-attached prosthetic feet.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 22, 2019
End Date
December 3, 2019
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Sara Morgan

Assistant Professor

University of Washington

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Have a unilateral Syme's amputation that occurred \>1 year prior
  • Owns a crossover foot modified for Syme's use
  • Able to walk in the community without assistance
  • Able to read and write in English

Exclusion Criteria

  • Have other amputations
  • Have a health condition that would limit completion of the study protocol (e.g., skin breakdown, heart disease)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Ratio Between Sound and Prosthetic Side Step Lengths

Time Frame: Sessions 3 (after 2 weeks of prosthesis 1 wear) and 4 (after 2 weeks of prosthesis 2 wear)

The symmetry between prosthetic and sound side step lengths. Step lengths were calculated as the distance between heels from heel strike of the contralateral foot to heel strike of the ipsilateral foot.

Total Prosthetic Ankle Range of Motion

Time Frame: Sessions 3 (after 2 weeks of prosthesis 1 wear) and 4 (after 2 weeks of prosthesis 2 wear)

The change in total angular motion of the ankle in the sagittal plane (e.g., dorsiflexion \& plantarflexion) during stance phase between prosthetic feet, in degrees

Prosthetic-side Energy Return

Time Frame: Sessions 3 (after 2 weeks of prosthesis 1 wear) and 4 (after 2 weeks of prosthesis 2 wear)

Intersegmental flow of power out of the prosthesis

Peak Sound-side Limb Loading

Time Frame: Sessions 3 (after 2 weeks of prosthesis 1 wear) and 4 (after 2 weeks of prosthesis 2 wear)

Maximum vertical ground reaction force in early stance

Secondary Outcomes

  • Preference Questionnaire(Session 4 (after 4 weeks of prosthesis wear, 2 weeks of prosthesis 1 and 2 weeks of prosthesis 2))
  • Change in Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) 12-item Short Form Version 1.2(Sessions 3 (after 2 weeks of prosthesis 1 wear) and 4 (after 2 weeks of prosthesis 2 wear))
  • Change in Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC)(Sessions 3 (after 2 weeks of prosthesis 1 wear) and 4 (after 2 weeks of prosthesis 2 wear))
  • Change in Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales- Revised Aesthetic Satisfaction(Sessions 3 (after 2 weeks of prosthesis 1 wear) and 4 (after 2 weeks of prosthesis 2 wear))

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials