Comparison of Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement with Two Minimally Invasive Techniques
Phase 4
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/04/065197
- Lead Sponsor
- ikita Mohelay
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. Patients with an age range of 16-22 years, consenting for the procedure.
2. Class I malocclusion with fully erupted maxillary canine.
3. Patients having a treatment plan of extraction of 1st premolars.
4. Patients with sound periodontal support
5. BMI in average range 18-25kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patients with long-term use of drugs affecting tooth movement.
2. Any other malocclusion.
3. Patients with systemic disease and any other extraction plan.
4. Patients with past periodontal disease/ past orthodontic history.
5. BMI above or below the average
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To assess and compare the reduction in the treatment time with two different accelerated orthodontic methods: Micro-osteo perforations and Interseptal Bone Reduction. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: T0- BASELINE <br/ ><br>T1- 30 days <br/ ><br>T2- 60 days <br/ ><br>T3- 90 days
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. To assess and quantify the effect of Micro- osteoperforations and Interseptal Bone Reduction on the rate of tooth movement. <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>2. To compare the rate of OTM between Micro- osteoperforations and Interseptal Bone Reduction. <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>3. To evaluate the rotational effect and root movement of canine. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: T0- BASELINE <br/ ><br>T1- 30 days <br/ ><br>T2- 60 days <br/ ><br>T3- 90 days