MedPath

A Study to Evaluate Different Targeted Therapies for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Phase 2
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT06972446
Lead Sponsor
AbbVie
Brief Summary

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease causing pain, stiffness, swelling and loss of joint function. This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of targeted therapies through a series of substudies for the treatment of moderately to severely active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA).

This study currently includes 3 substudies evaluating different treatments in participants with RA. Substudy 1 will evaluate lutikizumab compared to placebo (looks like the study treatment but contains no medicine). Substudy 2 will evaluate ravagalimab compared to placebo and Substudy 3 will evaluate lutikizumab and ravagalimab combination therapy (treatments given together) compared to placebo. Approximately 180 participants who have failed 1 or 2 biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD) therapies will be enrolled in the study at approximately 65 sites worldwide.

There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care treatment without participating in this study. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, blood tests, checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
180
Inclusion Criteria
  • At any time prior to the Screening Visit, participant must have been treated for > or = 3 months with at least 1 b/tsDMARD therapy but continued to exhibit active RA, or had to discontinue due to intolerability or toxicity, irrespective of treatment duration. The maximum cap for prior use of b/tsDMARD is 2.
  • Participant must be on a stable dose of methotrexate (MTX)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Participant is taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen/paracetamol, low-potency opioids (tramadol, codeine, hydrocodone, alone or in combination with acetaminophen), oral corticosteroids (equivalent to ≤ 10 mg/day of prednisone), or inhaled corticosteroids for stable medical conditions unless they have been on stable doses for ≥ 1 week prior to Baseline Visit.
  • History of any arthritis with onset prior to age 17 years or current diagnosis of inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Substudy 1: Lutikizumab MonotherapyLutikizumabParticipants will be randomized to receive Lutikizumab
Substudy 1: Matching Placebo MonotherapyPlaceboParticipants will be randomized to receive a matching placebo dose equivalent to the Lutikizumab monotherapy.
Substudy 2: Ravagalimab MonotherapyRavagalimabParticipants will be randomized to receive Ravagalimab
Substudy 2: Matching Placebo MonotherapyPlaceboParticipants will be randomized to receive a matching placebo dose equivalent to the Ravagalimab monotherapy
SubStudy 3: Lutikizumab and Ravagalimab Combination TherapyLutikizumabParticipants will be randomized to be administered Lutikizumab and Ravagalimab doses
SubStudy 3: Lutikizumab and Ravagalimab Combination TherapyRavagalimabParticipants will be randomized to be administered Lutikizumab and Ravagalimab doses
Substudy 3: Matching Placebo Combination TherapyPlaceboParticipants will be randomized to receive matching placebo doses equivalent to the Lutikizumab and Ravagalimab combination therapy
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) ResponseAt Week 12

Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria:

1. ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count;

2. ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and

3. ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:

* Physician global assessment of disease activity

* Patient global assessment of disease activity

* Patient assessment of pain

* Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)

* High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)

Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs)Up to Approximately Week 22

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation in which a participant is administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) ResponseAt Week 12

Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria:

1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count;

2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and

3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:

* Physician global assessment of disease activity

* Patient global assessment of disease activity

* Patient assessment of pain

* Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)

* High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) ResponseAt Week 12

Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria:

1. ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count;

2. ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and

3. ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:

* Physician global assessment of disease activity

* Patient global assessment of disease activity

* Patient assessment of pain

* Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)

* High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)

Percentage Of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) per Disease Activity Score-28 With C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)At Week 12

The Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 (lowest disease activity) to 10 (highest disease activity). LDA is defined as a score of \< or = to 3.2.

Percentage Of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) per DAS28 (CRP)At Week 12

The Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 (lowest disease activity) to 10 (highest disease activity). CR remission is defined as a score of less than 2.6

Change from Baseline in DAS28 (CRP)At Week 12

The DAS28-CRP is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (NRS), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP; in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28-CRP range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity.

Percentage Of Participants Achieving LDA per Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)At Week 12

The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. LDA is defined as a score from 2.8 to ≤ 10.

Percentage Of Participants Achieving CR per CDAIAt Week 12

The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. CR remission is defined as a score of less than 2.8

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath