Study comparing the effectiveness between PRF and hydroxyapatite graft material placement after removal of periapical cyst
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/06/014580
- Lead Sponsor
- Sri hasanamba dental college and hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Age: - 18 years and above of both sexes
The tooth to be treated should have a periradicular lesion and for which nonsurgical treatment alone is considered insufficient or retreatment is considered unfeasible or had previously failed.
Periapical pathology in anterior region of maxillary and mandibular region.
The diameter of the bone defect, as will be determined from the intraoral periapical radiographs, should be up to 2 cm x 2cm in diameter.
Patients in whom surgery is medically contraindicated.
Age less than 18 years.
Immuno-compromised and patients with metabolic disorders.
An active infection or a history of persistent infections.
The diameter of bony defect more than 2 cmÃ? 2 cm as determined from the intra oral periapical radiograph.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method it was concluded that both the graft materials prf and hydroxyapatite were efficient in improving clinical parameters as well as regenerative effects when used in the treatment of periapical defectTimepoint: it was concluded that both the graft materials prf and hydroxyapatite were efficient in improving clinical parameters as well as regenerative effects when used in the treatment of periapical defect
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method nil <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Timepoint: nil