Treatment Effects of Escitalopram (Lexapro®) on Generalized Anxiety Disorder in Patients With HIV and AIDS

Phase 3

Completed

Conditions: Anxiety Disorders
HIV Infections

Interventions: Drug: Escitalopram

Registration Number: NCT00887679

Lead Sponsor: Duke University

Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether escitalopram is safe, well tolerated, and effective in the treatment of HIV-infected patients with generalized anxiety disorder.

Detailed Description: Anxiety disorders are twice as prevalent among HIV-infected patients as they are in the general population. Approximately 25%-40% of HIV-infected patients have anxiety disorders; Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Panic disorder and post-traumatic Stress Disorder being the most frequent. Non-adherence to anti-retroviral medications is commonly seen in patients with HIV with GAD.The role of specific selective serotonin reuptake (SSRIs) in the treatment of HIV-patients with GAD is unclear. Escitalopram has been used in the treatment of GAD in the general population. It has been shown to be safe in HIV-patients with a tolerable side-effect profile. However, whether it can improve GAD in HIV-infected patients has not yet been investigated.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 30

Inclusion Criteria

age 18 to 65 years,
DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) criteria for Generalized Anxiety Disorder
confirmed stable HIV disease and attending a HIV treatment program
stable dose of highly active anti-retroviral therapy for a minimum of 4 weeks
ability to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

bipolar disorders, any psychotic disorder
current major depression
substance dependence (except nicotine dependence) in the previous 3 months
currently suicidal or high suicide risk, serious or unstable medical disorders (e.g. uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes)
any hospitalization for HIV-related illness in the previous 3 months
any active CNS (central nervous system) CNS opportunistic infection or CNS malignancies related to HIV
current active treatment for opportunistic infections related to HIV
any psychotropic drug treatment in the previous 2 weeks before screening
history of hypersensitivity to escitalopram and/or citalopram
admission BDI 23
seizure disorder, traumatic brain injury
pregnant, nursing mother or planning to get pregnant.
Concomitant mediations: At least 2-week washout of antidepressant (4 weeks for fluoxetine) or antipsychotic or anti-anxiety medications.
In the opinion of the investigator the clinical condition precludes participation in the trial.

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Escitalopram	Escitalopram	Treatment effects of Escitalopram in Generalized Anxiety Disorder in patients with HIV/AIDS.Open label, rater-blinded, prospective, 6-week trial of escitalopram.Subjects received escitalopram 10-20mg. Escitalopram was started at 10mg per day and augmented weekly in 10mg per day increments, the maximum dose being 20mg per day.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change From Randomization to End of Treatment in Scores on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)	baseline and 7 weeks	The HAM-A is administered by an interviewer who asks a series of questions related to symptoms of anxiety. The interviewer then rates the individual on a five-point scale for each of the 14 items. Seven of the items specifically address psychic anxiety and the remaining seven items address somatic anxiety. The total anxiety score ranges from 0 to 56, lower scores are better. Change from randomization to end of treatment in scores on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)is measured.
Changes From Randomization to End of Treatment in Scores on the Beck Depression Inventory	baseline and 7 weeks	Scoring The BDI consist of twenty-one questions about how the subject has been feeling in the last week. Each question has a set of at least four possible answer choices, ranging in intensity as follows: (0) I do not feel sad. 1. I feel sad. 2. I am sad all the time and I can't snap out of it. 3. I am so sad or unhappy that I can't stand it. A value of 0 to 3 is assigned for each answer and the total score is compared to a key to determine the depression's severity. The standard cut-offs are as follows:\[6\] 0-9: indicates minimal depression 10-18: indicates mild depression 19-29: indicates moderate depression 30-63: indicates severe depression. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change From Randomization to End of Treatment in Scores for the Clinical Global Impression(CGI-S and CGI-I)	baseline and 7 weeks	Scale for scoring: Clinical Global Impression(CGI-S) 1. = Normal, no symptoms 2. = Borderline ill 3. = Mildly ill 4. = Moderately ill 5. = Markedly ill 6. = Severely ill 7. = Most extremely ill Clinical Global Impression(CGI-I)-improvement since treatment 1. very much improved 2. much improved 3. minimally improved 4. no change from baseline 5. minimally worse 6. much worse 7. very much worse
Change From Randomization to End of Treatment for Trail Making Tet (TMT)	baseline to 7 weeks	Trail Making Test (TMT)Results for TMT are reported as the number of seconds required to complete the task. Higher scores reveal greater impairment. Average =29 seconds, Deficient \> 78 seconds
Changes From Randomization to End of Treatment in Scores on the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)	baseline and 7 weeks	Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE),a low score less than or equal to 23 indicates cognitive impairment and the need for further evaluation; normal cognitive function = 27-30, mild cognitive impairment = 21-26, moderate cognitive impairment = 11-20, and severe cognitive impairment = 0-10. The highest possible score is 30.
Changes From Randomization to End of Treatment in Scores on the Sheehan Disability Scores (SDS)	baseline and 7 weeks	Scoring: Participants rate the extent to which work, social life, and home life are impaired by his or her symptoms. A 10 point scale is used where 0= not impaired and 10 is highly impaired indicating. The three aspects of life can be summed up into a single dimensional measure of global functional impairment that indicates 0= not impaired and 30 = highly impaired. Scores of 5 or greater are on any of the three scales are considered significant.