MedPath

A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Effect of an "Inclisiran First" Implementation Strategy Compared to Usual Care in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Elevated LDL-C Despite Receiving Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy (VICTORION-INITIATE)

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT04929249
Lead Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of an "inclisiran first" implementation strategy (addition of inclisiran to maximally tolerated statin therapy immediately upon failure to achieve acceptable LDL-C with maximally tolerated statin therapy alone) compared to usual care in an ASCVD population.

Detailed Description

The study design will be a randomized, two-arm, parallel-group, open-label, multicenter, clinical trial comparing an "inclisiran first" implementation strategy to usual care in approximately 444 participants (1:1 randomization) with established ASCVD and elevated LDL-C (or non-HDL-C) despite treatment with maximally tolerated statin therapy.

The study will include male and female participants ≥18 years of age with a history of ASCVD (coronary heart disease, ischemic cerebrovascular disease or peripheral arterial disease) who have elevated LDL-C (≥70 mg/dL) or non-HDL-C (≥100 mg/dL) despite being treated with maximally tolerated statin therapy. A total of approximately 444 participants will be randomized to the "inclisiran first" implementation strategy or usual care in a 1:1 ratio at approximately 50 US sites.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
450
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Participants meeting any of the following criteria are not eligible for inclusion in this study.

  1. Any uncontrolled or serious disease, or any medical or surgical condition, that may either interfere with participation in the clinical study, and/or put the participant at significant risk (according to investigator's [or delegate] judgment) if he/she participates in the clinical study

  2. An underlying known disease, or surgical, physical, or medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator (or delegate) might interfere with interpretation of the clinical study results

  3. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart failure or last known left ventricular ejection fraction <30%

  4. Significant cardiac arrhythmia within 3 months prior to randomization that is not controlled by medication or via ablation at the time of screening

  5. Major adverse cardiovascular event within 6 months prior to randomization

  6. Uncontrolled severe hypertension: systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg prior to randomization despite antihypertensive therapy

  7. Severe concomitant non-cardiovascular disease that carries the risk of reducing life expectancy to less than 2 years

  8. History of malignancy that required surgery (excluding local and wide-local excision), radiation therapy and/or systemic therapy during the two years prior to randomization

  9. Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using basic methods of contraception during dosing of investigational drug. Basic contraception methods include:

    1. Total abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant. Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception
    2. Female sterilization (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least six weeks before taking investigational drug. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment
    3. Male sterilization (at least 6 m prior to screening). For female participants in the study, the vasectomized male partner should be the sole partner for that participant
    4. Barrier methods of contraception: Condom or Occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps)
    5. Use of oral (estrogen and progesterone), injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception or other forms of hormonal contraception that have comparable efficacy (failure rate <1%), for example hormone vaginal ring or transdermal hormone contraception or placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS) In case of use of oral contraception, women should have been stable on the same pill for a minimum of 3 months before taking investigational drug.

    Women are considered post-menopausal and not of child bearing potential if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (e.g. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least six weeks ago. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment is she considered not of child bearing potential.

  10. Known history of alcohol and/or drug abuse within the last 5 years (occasional casual users of illicit drugs in the opinion of the investigators are not excluded)

  11. Treatment with other investigational products or devices within 30 days or five half-lives of the screening visit, whichever is longer

  12. History of hypersensitivity to any of the study treatments or its excipients or to drugs of similar chemical classes

  13. Planned use of other investigational products or devices during the course of the study

  14. Any condition that according to the investigator could interfere with the conduct of the study, such as but not limited to:

    1. Participants who are unable to communicate or to cooperate with the investigator
    2. Unable to understand the protocol requirements, instructions and study-related restrictions, the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study (including participants whose cooperation is doubtful due to drug abuse or alcohol dependency)
    3. Unlikely to comply with the protocol requirements, instructions, and study-related restrictions (e.g., uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits, and improbability of completing the study - including potential participants who indicate that their participation is contingent on receiving inclisiran)
    4. Have any medical or surgical condition, which in the opinion of the investigator would put the participant at increased risk from participating in the study
    5. Persons directly involved in the conduct of the study
  15. Previous or current treatment (within 90 days of screening) with monoclonal antibodies directed towards PCSK9 or ezetimibe

  16. Active liver disease defined as any known current infectious, neoplastic, or metabolic pathology of the liver or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation >3x ULN, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation >3x ULN, or total bilirubin elevation >2x ULN (except patients with Gilbert's syndrome) at screening confirmed by a repeat measurement at least one week apart

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Inclisiran FirstInclisiranInclisiran sodium 300 mg 1.5 ml (equivalent to 284 mg of inclisiran) + usual care
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-CBaseline, Day 330

Percent change from baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of an "inclisiran first" implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330.

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Statin TherapyDay 330

Percentage of patients who discontinued statin therapy ≥ 30 days before the end-of-study visit of an "inclisiran first" implementation strategy compared to usual care, for patients in the FAS excluding those with a medical history of statin intolerance.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Absolute Change From Baseline in LDL-CBaseline, Day 330

Absolute change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of an "inclisiran first" implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330

Average Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C Levels Across VisitsUp to 330 Days

Average percent change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of an "inclisiran first" implementation strategy compared to usual care across visits.

Calculated by averaging the observed post-baseline values (percent change) for each participant across analysis visits.

Average Absolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C Levels Across VisitsUp to 330 days

Average absolute change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of an "inclisiran first" implementation strategy compared to usual care across visits.

Calculated by averaging the observed post-baseline values (absolute change) for each participant across analysis visits.

Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in LDL-CBaseline, Day 330

Percentage of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of an "inclisiran first" implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330.

Missing data is imputed using "non-responder" (i.e., "negative" outcome) imputation.

Percentage of Participants Achieving LDL-C < 100 mg/dL.Day 330

Percentage of participants achieving Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) \< 100 mg/dL (among the subset of participants with LDL-C \>=100 mg/dL at baseline) of an "inclisiran first" implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330.

Missing data is imputed using "non-responder" (i.e., "negative" outcome) imputation.

Percentage of Participants Achieving LDL-C < 70 mg/dLDay 330

Percentage of participants achieving Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) \< 70 mg/dL of an "inclisiran first" implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330.

Missing data is imputed using "non-responder" (i.e., "negative" outcome) imputation.

Percentage of Participants Achieving LDL-C < 55 mg/dLDay 330

Percentage of participants achieving Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) \< 55 mg/dL of an "inclisiran first" implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330.

Missing data is imputed using "non-responder" (i.e., "negative" outcome) imputation.

Percent Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineBaseline, Day 330

Percent change in plasma lipids, lipoproteins and triglycerides in participants receiving an "inclisiran first" implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330

Absolute Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineBaseline, Day 330

Absolute change in plasma lipids, lipoproteins and triglycerides in participants receiving an "inclisiran first" implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330

Percentage of Participants by Intensity of Lipid Lowering TherapyBaseline, Day 330

Percentage of participants with decrease in dose, no change in dose or increase in dose to assess changes in background lipid-lowering therapy in participants receiving an "inclisiran first" implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330

Proportion of Days Covered by MedicationUp to 330 Days

Proportion of days covered refers to the total number of days on either statin, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid or PCSK9 inhibiting monoclonal antibody therapies taken during the study divided by total number of study days, calculated for each participant; If a participant did not take any of the four medications then the total number of days will be assumed to be zero.

LDL-C Measures of Variability - Standard DeviationDay 90, Day 180, Day 270 and Day 330

Visit-to-visit LDL-C variability from Day 90 until Day 330 of an "inclisiran first" implementation strategy compared to usual care. It was assessed using two measures of variability: standard deviation and coefficient of variation.

LDL-C Measures of Variability - Coefficient of VariationDay 90, Day 180, Day 270 and Day 330

Visit-to-visit LDL-C variability from Day 90 until Day 330 of an "inclisiran first" implementation strategy compared to usual care. It was assessed using two measures of variability: standard deviation and coefficient of variation.

Trial Locations

Locations (43)

ARcare Center for Clinical Research .

🇺🇸

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

ARcare Center for Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Keck Medical Center USC .

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

d-b-a Greenwich Cardio Assoc CLCZ696BUS08

🇺🇸

Greenwich, Connecticut, United States

Cardiology Ass of Fairfield County .

🇺🇸

Stamford, Connecticut, United States

Integrative Research Associates Inc

🇺🇸

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Elite Cardiac Research Center .

🇺🇸

Hialeah, Florida, United States

University of Florida Health Science Center .

🇺🇸

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Jacksonville Ctr for Clin Rea Encore Research Group

🇺🇸

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Internal Medicine and Cardiology

🇺🇸

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Gateway Cardiology PC CACZ885M2301_Younis

🇺🇸

Jerseyville, Illinois, United States

Affinity Health Corp

🇺🇸

Oak Brook, Illinois, United States

Northwestern Medicine Northwestern University .

🇺🇸

Winfield, Illinois, United States

Indiana University Health

🇺🇸

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

St Elizabeth Healthcare .

🇺🇸

Edgewood, Kentucky, United States

Alexandria Cardiology Clinic .

🇺🇸

Alexandria, Louisiana, United States

Medstar Health Research Institute .

🇺🇸

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

MedStar Good Samaritan Hospital

🇺🇸

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Bryan LGH Heart Inst Intigrated Cardiology Group .

🇺🇸

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Inspira Health Network The Heart House

🇺🇸

Elmer, New Jersey, United States

New Jersey Heart

🇺🇸

Linden, New Jersey, United States

Montefiore Hospital .

🇺🇸

Bronx, New York, United States

New York Presbyterian Queens .

🇺🇸

Flushing, New York, United States

New York Presbyterian Hospital .

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

State Uni of NY at Stony Brook .

🇺🇸

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Milton S Hershey Medical Center

🇺🇸

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Capital Area Research LLC Suite 330

🇺🇸

Newport, Pennsylvania, United States

Capital Area Research

🇺🇸

Newport, Pennsylvania, United States

Cardiology Consultants of Philadelphia

🇺🇸

Yardley, Pennsylvania, United States

Alliance for Multispecialty Res LLC

🇺🇸

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Cypress Heart and Vascular Center

🇺🇸

Cypress, Texas, United States

NW Houston Neuro Comp Sleep Med Ctr

🇺🇸

Cypress, Texas, United States

Primecare Medical Group

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

Synergy Group Medical LLC .

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

Synergy Group Medical LLC

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

Northwest Houston Cardiology PA .

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

Synergy Groups Medical LLC

🇺🇸

Missouri City, Texas, United States

Bay Area Heart Ace Clinical Resh Gp .

🇺🇸

Webster, Texas, United States

Centra Health .

🇺🇸

Lynchburg, Virginia, United States

National Clinical Research .

🇺🇸

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Exemplar Research Inc .

🇺🇸

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Marshfield Medical Clinic .

🇺🇸

Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States

Marshfield Clinic Health System

🇺🇸

Weston, Wisconsin, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath