Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05521516
NCT05521516CompletedNot Applicable

Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation for Postoperative Analgesia: A Randomized, Participant- and Observer-Masked, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study

University of California, San Diego2 sites in 1 country122 target enrollmentStarted: October 12, 2022Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
122
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale First 5 Postoperative Days

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The moderate-to-severe pain many patients experience following surgery is often treated with opioids, which are associated with side effects such as nausea/vomiting, sedation, and respiratory depression (and a risk of abuse, dependence, and diversion). Potent site-specific analgesia with fewer side effects may be provided with peripheral nerve blocks. However, these too have limitations such as a duration of action measured in hours, while the pain from surgery is usually measured in days or weeks. Peripheral nerve stimulation or "neuromodulation" is an alternative method of pain control involving the introduction of electrical current to stimulate various nerves that do not carry pain sensations, but which then decreases communication between pain fibers and the spinal cord and/or brain. Placing small electrodes specifically in the area of the ear is called "auricular neuromodulation" and is theorized to function by stimulating various cranial and peripheral nerves that influence a part of the brain called the "limbic system" which is involved with many aspects of behavior including responses to stress. A device that delivers auricular neuromodulation, the "Bridge" system, is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for use to reduce symptoms associated with opioid withdrawal for up to 5 days. However, one prospective and two published retrospective studies suggest that it may provide postoperative analgesia as well. The device itself is relatively simple to apply; has few contraindications, side effects, or adverse events; and has no potential for dependence, abuse, or diversion. Therefore, it has the potential to concurrently improve analgesia and decrease or even negate opioid requirements following surgery, only without the limitations of opioids and peripheral nerve blocks. The purpose of this pilot study is to explore the possibility of treating postoperative pain with percutaneous auricular neuromodulation, optimize the study protocol, and estimate the treatment effect in preparation for developing a subsequent definitive clinical trial.

Detailed Description

The proposed study will be a randomized, participant- and observer-masked, sham-controlled, parallel-arm, human participants pilot study with two primary aims:

Specific Aim 1: To determine the feasibility and optimize the protocol for a subsequent clinical trial that will compare the addition of percutaneous auricular neuromodulation to usual and customary analgesia following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures.

Specific Aim 2: To estimate the treatment effect of adding percutaneous auricular neuromodulation to usual and customary analgesia on pain and opioid consumption following various surgical procedures. This will provide an idea of the optimal surgical procedures amenable to this analgesic technique and allow determination of the required sample size of a subsequent definitive clinical trial.

Hypothesis 1: Auricular neuromodulation decreases pain in the 5 days following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures currently treated with a single-injection peripheral nerve block.

Hypothesis 2: Auricular neuromodulation decreases opioid use in the 5 days following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures currently treated with a single-injection peripheral nerve block.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

The Investigational Drug Service will create the randomization tables and provide the investigators with the appropriate device (active or sham), leaving all participants, investigators, and the statistician masked to treatment group assignment.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • undergoing one of these surgical procedures as a primary procedure (not revision):
  • septoplasty [infraorbital nerve block]
  • laparoscopic cholecystectomy [transversus abdominis nerve block]
  • laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy [transversus abdominis nerve block]
  • non-mastectomy breast surgery [paravertebral nerve block]
  • percutaneous nephrolithotomy [erector spinae plane nerve block]
  • inguinal hernia repair [transversus abdominis nerve block]
  • knee arthroplasty [adductor canal nerve block]
  • hip arthroplasty [pericapsular nerve group block]
  • shoulder acromioclavicular joint repair, labral repair, subacromial decompression, or Bankart repair (without rotator cuff repair) [interscalene nerve block]
  • orthopedic hardware removal anticipated to be at least moderately painful postoperatively [various peripheral nerve blocks]
  • analgesic plan includes a single-injection peripheral nerve block with a long-acting local anesthetic [may be waived for hip arthroplasty]
  • age 18 years or older.

Exclusion Criteria

  • concurrent use of another electric stimulator (e.g., cardiac pacemaker)
  • bleeding disorder
  • anticoagulation
  • skin abnormality at the treatment site
  • psoriasis vulgaris
  • morbid obesity as defined by a body mass index > 40
  • history of opioid abuse
  • inability to communicate with the investigators or hospital staff
  • bilateral or multi-stage surgical procedures
  • incarceration
  • chronic opioid or tramadol use (daily use within the 2 weeks prior to surgery and duration of use > 4 weeks)
  • neuro-muscular deficit of the surgical area/limb.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale First 5 Postoperative Days

Time Frame: The first 5 postoperative days

The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale. The outcome will the mean value of daily average pain scores measured with the Numeric Rating Scale. The primary outcome measure will be the mean value of the average daily pain measured on postoperative days 1-5.

Total OPIOID Consumption From Recovery Room Discharge Until the Data Collection Phone Call on Postoperative Day 5 (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)

Time Frame: Postoperative days 0-5

Total opioid consumption from recovery room discharge until the data collection phone call on postoperative day 5 (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents).

Secondary Outcomes

  • AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale(Recorded on postoperative days 1-8 for the previous 24-hour period)
  • CURRENT Pain at the Time of the Data-collection Phone Call Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale(Recorded on postoperative days 2, 4, 6, and 8)
  • WORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale(Recorded on postoperative days 1-8 for the previous 24-hour period)
  • LEAST (Lowest or Minimum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale(Recorded on postoperative days 2, 4, 6, and 8 for the previous 24-hour period)
  • Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)(Recorded on postoperative days 1-8)
  • Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)(Recorded on postoperative days 2, 4, 6, and 8 for the previous 24-hour period)
  • Awakenings Due to Pain(Recorded on postoperative days 1-8 for the previous night)
  • Masking(Recorded on postoperative day 1)
  • Hospitalization Duration Measured in Days(Up to 2 weeks after surgery)
  • Tourniquet Duration(Intraoperative (within the operating room))
  • Surgical Duration(Intraoperative (within the operating room))

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS

Professor of Anesthesiology, In Residence

University of California, San Diego

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials