Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2023/10/058451
CTRI/2023/10/058451
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4

Comparison of two novel distraction techniques: an in vivo study - NI

DrHarshita Gosavi0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
DrHarshita Gosavi
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
2 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional

Investigators

Sponsor
DrHarshita Gosavi

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •1\)Children aged 6\-12 years old of either gender
  • •2\)Negative Frankl behavior rating scale
  • •3\)Needle phobic patients

Exclusion Criteria

  • •1\) Patients not willing to participate in the study

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
Effect of distraction on Pain during venipuncturepain.Acute Pain
IRCT2015030621349N1Vice chancellor for research, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences90
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparation of two methods of distraction on anxiety and pai
IRCT20240424061558N2Yasouj University of Medical Sciences81
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of the effect of distraction technique and valsalva maneuver on the intensity of peripheral venous cannulation pai
IRCT20190428043408N1Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences150
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of the effect of two virtual reality methods and guided visualization on intravenous cannulation paichronic renal failure.Chronic kidney disease, stage 5
IRCT20171219037966N3Gonabad University of Medical Sciences60
Active, not recruiting
Phase 4
Effectiveness of Two Distraction Techniques during Intra Oral Local Anaesthesia Administration among ChildreHealth Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis
CTRI/2023/12/060875Dr Basil M Mathew