Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05723679
NCT05723679RecruitingNot Applicable

Targeting Breathing Limitations to Improve Functional Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center2 sites in 1 country78 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2023Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
78
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
O2 cost of breathing (Objective 1)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The overall purpose of this study is to investigate whether pulmonary limitations that increase the oxygen (O2) cost of breathing impact dyspnea on exertion (DOE) and peak exercise capacity in patients with HFpEF and obesity. As per investigator's hypothesis, obesity is likely a significant contributor to DOE and exercise intolerance in patients with HFpEF.

Detailed Description

Clinical screening tests including cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), pulmonary function testing, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans will be performed on all subjects. Investigator's approach will be to undertake the following objectives:

Objective 1: (Observational) is a cross-sectional study designed to test the interaction of HFpEF (underlying changes in pulmonary function) and obesity (obesity-related changes in pulmonary function) on the O2 cost of breathing, and its association with DOE and peak exercise capacity. The specific hypotheses proposed to test as part of this objective are:

Hypothesis 1.1: Due to the presence of obesity-related mechanical ventilatory constraints, the O2 cost of breathing will be greater in obese HFpEF patients and obese controls vs. nonobese HFpEF patients and nonobese controls, but will be similar between obese HFpEF patients vs. obese controls.

Hypothesis 1.2: The association between the O2 cost of breathing and DOE and the association between the O2 cost of breathing and peak exercise capacity will be stronger in obese HFpEF patients and obese controls vs. nonobese HFpEF patients and nonobese controls, but will be similar between obese HFpEF patients vs. obese controls.

Objective 2: (Interventional) is a single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial designed to investigate the effects of reducing obesity-related mechanical ventilatory constraints by breathing a HeO2 gas mixture (HeO2: 21% O2 and 79% He) on DOE and peak exercise capacity. The specific hypotheses proposed to test as part of this objective are:

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
Single (Participant)

Masking Description

The order of the room air and HeO2 tests will be randomized and the subjects will not be told what gas mixture they will be breathing.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
55 Years to 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • signs and symptoms of heart failure
  • an ejection fraction > 0.50;
  • objective evidence of diastolic dysfunction. elevated biomarkers (NT-proBNP >300 ng/dl) or HF hospitalization
  • healthy volunteers

Exclusion Criteria

  • age < 55 years
  • BMI > 50 kg/m2
  • Atrial fibrillation with poorly controlled heart rate
  • phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor use
  • severe valvular disease
  • severe Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Chronic kidney disease (CKD) 4 or higher
  • any restriction of ambulation and mobility.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

O2 cost of breathing (Objective 1)

Time Frame: Day 2

O2 cost of breathing measured during eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation, and calculated using oxygen uptake and ventilation variables.

Change in DOE during HeO2 breathing (Objective 2)

Time Frame: Day 3 or 4

Dyspnea on Exertion (DOE) will be assessed via ratings of perceived breathlessness (RPB) using a 0-10 Borg Scale, and will be compared with that measured during room air breathing.

Change in peak exercise capacity during HeO2 breathing (Objective 2)

Time Frame: Day 3 or 4

Peak exercise capacity will be assessed by measuring peak oxygen uptake (in L/min, measured via a breath-by-breath metabolic measurement system), peak power output recorded from a cycle ergometer (Watts), and/or total exercise duration (minutes).

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Bryce Balmain

Principal Investigator

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials