MedPath

Clinical and electrophysiological evaluation of the effect of adjuvant peripheral magnetic stimulation in the treatment of post-stroke ankle flexor spasticity-randomized controlled study

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Stroke
Spasticity
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation - Physiotherapy
Stroke - Ischaemic
Stroke - Haemorrhagic
Neurological - Other neurological disorders
Registration Number
ACTRN12622000266763
Lead Sponsor
Ankara University
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Recruiting
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria

1) Being diagnosed with stroke according to the definition of the World Health Organization (1989)
2) Being over 18 years old
3) Having a stroke confirmed by Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
4) Patients with spasticity between 1 and 3 according to the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the lower extremity plantar flexor muscles
5) Wellness of the patient's general condition after stroke

Exclusion Criteria

1) Patients treated with botulinum toxin, phenol, alcohol injection for spasticity in the last 6 months
2) Patients who have previously undergone antispastic surgery to the treatment area
3) Patients with a change in oral antispastic drug use in the last 6 months
4) Patients with fixed ankle contracture
5) Patients with signs of acute inflammation in the treatment area
6) Patients with bleeding diathesis
7) Patients with implanted devices (cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implant, drug pumps)
8) Patients with vascular problems such as deep vein thrombosis, phlebitis, varicose veins, arterial disease
9) Patients with a history of cancer in the treatment area
10) Pregnancy
11) Patients with metal implants in the treatment area
12) Patients with nonunion fractures at the treatment site

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in muscle tone assessed by modified Ashworth scale.[ 1-At admission, 2-Immediately after first session, 3-After tenth session, 4-Two weeks after last session completed.];Change in velocity dependent component of spasticity assessed by modified Tardieu score.[ 1-At admission, 2-Immediately after first session, 3-After tenth session, 4-Two weeks after last session completed.];Change in H reflex/M response ratio measured by Electroneuromyography[ 1-At admission, 2-Immediately after first session, 3-After tenth session, 4-Two weeks after last session completed.]
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
change in functional mobility and gait assessed by 6 meter timed walk test<br><br>Explanation for query: This test is same as 10-Meter Timed Walk test. The difference is walking distance. It has shown that 6 meter walk test is valid: <br>Helen S P Lam, Frank W K Lau, Galen K L Chan & Kevin Sykes (2010) The validity and reliability of a 6-Metre Timed Walk for the functional assessment of patients with stroke, Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 26:4, 251-255, DOI: 10.3109/09593980903015235[ 1-At admission, 2-After tenth session, 3-Two weeks after last session completed.];Change in functional mobility assessed with Mobility and Stair section of modified Barthel Index.[ 1-At admission, 2-After tenth session, 3-Two weeks after last session completed.]
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath