MedPath

Efficacy And Safety Of Azithromycin SR Compared With Minocycline In Acne

Phase 3
Terminated
Conditions
Acne Vulgaris
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT00392223
Lead Sponsor
Pfizer
Brief Summary

The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of azithromycin microspheres treatment in outpatients with moderate to severe inflammatory acne compared with first line treatment minocycline after 8 weeks of therapy

Detailed Description

The study prematurely discontinued on the February 1, 2008 due to slow enrollment.It should be noted that safety concerns have not been seen in this study and have not factored into this decision.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
118
Inclusion Criteria
  • male and female, > 16 years of age, with diagnosis of acne papulo-pustular, moderate (19-30 GAGS score) to severe (31-33 GAGS score)
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • pregnancy, gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease, specific systemic disease, hormonal contraceptives, isotretinoin, topic drugs for acne (except detergent allowed)
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Treatment Group AAzithromycin microspheres-
Treatment Group BAzithromycin microspheres-placebo-
Treatment Group BMinocycline capsules,-
Treatment Group Aminocycline-placebo capsules-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreBaseline, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT)

GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: (Global) score at observation minus (global) score at baseline.

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT) in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score - Per Protocol PopulationBaseline, Week 8 EOT

GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: (Global) score at observation minus (global) score at baseline.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreBaseline, Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT

GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi. Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: mean at observation minus baseline.

Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT

Number of subjects by improvement category of GAGS score: Best improvement = reduction of GAGS score \>75% (pre-post evaluation); Good improvement = reduction score \> 50 - 75%; Moderate improvement : reduction score \> 25 - 50%; Light improvement : reduction score \> 0 - 25%; No change = reduction score = 0%; Worsening = increase score \> 0 %.

Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueBaseline, Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT

Leeds Grading technique: evaluates three sites (face, back, chest) on a 0 to 10 grading scale where 0 equals to no acne and 10 equals to most severe acne.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Pfizer Investigational Site

🇮🇹

Trieste, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath