Efficacy And Safety Of Azithromycin SR Compared With Minocycline In Acne
- Conditions
- Acne Vulgaris
- Interventions
- Drug: Azithromycin microspheresDrug: Azithromycin microspheres-placeboDrug: Minocycline capsules,Drug: minocycline-placebo capsules
- Registration Number
- NCT00392223
- Lead Sponsor
- Pfizer
- Brief Summary
The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of azithromycin microspheres treatment in outpatients with moderate to severe inflammatory acne compared with first line treatment minocycline after 8 weeks of therapy
- Detailed Description
The study prematurely discontinued on the February 1, 2008 due to slow enrollment.It should be noted that safety concerns have not been seen in this study and have not factored into this decision.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 118
- male and female, > 16 years of age, with diagnosis of acne papulo-pustular, moderate (19-30 GAGS score) to severe (31-33 GAGS score)
- pregnancy, gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease, specific systemic disease, hormonal contraceptives, isotretinoin, topic drugs for acne (except detergent allowed)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Treatment Group A Azithromycin microspheres - Treatment Group B Azithromycin microspheres-placebo - Treatment Group B Minocycline capsules, - Treatment Group A minocycline-placebo capsules -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score Baseline, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT) GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: (Global) score at observation minus (global) score at baseline.
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT) in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score - Per Protocol Population Baseline, Week 8 EOT GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: (Global) score at observation minus (global) score at baseline.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi. Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: mean at observation minus baseline.
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT Number of subjects by improvement category of GAGS score: Best improvement = reduction of GAGS score \>75% (pre-post evaluation); Good improvement = reduction score \> 50 - 75%; Moderate improvement : reduction score \> 25 - 50%; Light improvement : reduction score \> 0 - 25%; No change = reduction score = 0%; Worsening = increase score \> 0 %.
Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds Technique Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT Leeds Grading technique: evaluates three sites (face, back, chest) on a 0 to 10 grading scale where 0 equals to no acne and 10 equals to most severe acne.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Pfizer Investigational Site
🇮🇹Trieste, Italy