Comparing Two Ways of Controlling Blood Sugar With Insulin in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Critical Illness; Hyperglycemia

• Registration Number: NCT00166491
• Lead Sponsor: Mayo Clinic

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if there is any difference between two ways of controlling blood sugar with insulin. In patients admitted to the intensive care unit, blood sugar levels often rise due to the stress of illness or surgery. Studies have shown that patients do better if their blood sugar is kept normal. In order to maintain normal blood sugar levels, the investigators often give insulin (a substance made by the body), and they decide how much to give based on how high the blood sugar is. This study will compare two different ways of deciding how much insulin to give and compare how well each method keeps the blood sugar in a normal range. Both ways of controlling blood sugar are institutionally-approved protocols and part of routine care.

Detailed Description

Improved outcomes have been demonstrated with tight control of blood glucose in critically ill patients. A number of look-up algorithms based on hourly glucose measurements and titrated intravenous insulin have been developed for the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite the numerous published algorithms, no study has investigated which algorithm results in optimal glycemic control in critically ill patients. The purpose of this trial is to compare two institutionally approved intravenous insulin administration algorithms and describe subsequent glycemic control. We hypothesize that the protocol that allows for variable insulin administration for a given blood glucose (multiple algorithms) will be associated with more optimal glycemic control. Optimal glycemic control will be defined by time spent within a predetermined blood glucose range. In addition, the number of hypoglycemic episodes and mean and maximum blood glucose concentrations will also be measured. This trial will determine which insulin infusion algorithm is most effective in terms of glycemic control, and allow for standardization of glucose management in accordance with best practice.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2005-07
• Study First Submitted: 2005-09-12
• Study First Submitted QC: 2005-09-12
• Study First Posted: 2005-09-14
• Primary Completion: 2007-03
• Study Completion: 2007-03
• Status Verified: 2011-04
• Last Update Submitted: 2011-04-15
• Last Update Posted: 2011-04-18

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 238

Inclusion Criteria

• All patients admitted to the 7MB D/E ICU will be eligible for this study

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Percentage of time points within range during protocol (serum glucose 60-150 mg/dl) [%]
Mean blood glucose level during study period [mg/dl]

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Time from initiation of protocol to first measurement in target range (serum glucose 60-150 mg/dl) [hours]
Number of time points below range (hypoglycemic episodes with serum glucose < 60) normalized by study period [hypoglycemic glucose determinations/total glucose determinations]
Time enrolled in the trial [hours]
Maximum blood glucose level during study period [mg/dl]
Mean hourly intravenous (IV) insulin dose calculated daily [units/hour]

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mayo Clinic; 🇺🇸 Rochester, Minnesota, United States