跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03965481
NCT03965481进行中(未招募)不适用

Comparing Accuracy of PET/MR vs. CECT in Assessment of Peritoneal Disease for Resectability in Patients With Ovarian Cancer or Highly Suspected Ovarian Cancer

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 21 人开始时间: 2018年5月12日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
入组人数
21
试验地点
1
主要终点
Lesion detection accuracy

研究概览

简要总结

This trial studies how well positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) versus contrast enhanced computerized tomography (CECT) scans work in locating ovarian cancer tumors in patients with known or suspected ovarian cancer. PET, MR, and CECT scans use different methods to create images of areas inside the body. This trial is being done to see if PET/MR scans may help doctors locate ovarian cancer tumors, predict how well these tumors may be removed during surgery, and predict how patients respond to platinum-based chemotherapies compared to standard of care CECT scans.

详细描述

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To compare PET/MR and contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) to determine the accuracy in patients with advanced-stage serous ovarian cancer or highly suspected ovarian cancer using diagnostic laparoscopy as the gold standard with respect to lesion detection.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES (EXPLORATORY):

I. Correlating imaging findings such as enhancement pattern, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, standardized uptake value (SUV) values, and advanced image analytics such as texture with pathology and genomic analysis for those lesions evaluated as a discovery arm.

II. Assess whether MR (multiparametric and functional) and PET findings predict response to platinum based chemotherapy.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with ovarian cancer or highly suspected ovarian cancer who are eligible to undergo laparoscopic evaluation for resectability will be enrolled in the trial.
  • Patients who have estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) > 30.

排除标准

  • Patients allergic to gadolinium.
  • Patients who have eGRF <
  • Patients with cardiac pacers.
  • Pediatric patients.
  • Greater than 400 pounds in weight.
  • Blood glucose (> 200 mg/dl).
  • Pregnant women.

研究组 & 干预措施

Diagnostic (CECT, PET-MRI)

Experimental

Patients undergo standard of care CECT scan and PET-MRI scan over 90-120 minutes within 30 days before laparoscopy or cytoreduction. Patients who do not undergo cytoreduction based on diagnostic laparoscopy undergo additional PET-MRI and standard of care CECT scans after completion of chemotherapy and before cytoreduction.

干预措施: Dynamic Enhanced CT (Radiation)

Diagnostic (CECT, PET-MRI)

Experimental

Patients undergo standard of care CECT scan and PET-MRI scan over 90-120 minutes within 30 days before laparoscopy or cytoreduction. Patients who do not undergo cytoreduction based on diagnostic laparoscopy undergo additional PET-MRI and standard of care CECT scans after completion of chemotherapy and before cytoreduction.

干预措施: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Procedure)

Diagnostic (CECT, PET-MRI)

Experimental

Patients undergo standard of care CECT scan and PET-MRI scan over 90-120 minutes within 30 days before laparoscopy or cytoreduction. Patients who do not undergo cytoreduction based on diagnostic laparoscopy undergo additional PET-MRI and standard of care CECT scans after completion of chemotherapy and before cytoreduction.

干预措施: Positron Emission Tomography (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Lesion detection accuracy

时间窗: Up to 3 years

Lesion detection accuracy will be summarized using frequencies and percentages by modality. McNemar's test will be used to compare accuracies between positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) and contrast enhanced computerized tomography (CECT). Other diagnostic metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value) will be estimated along with 95% confidence intervals. Logistic regression model will be used to assess effect of patient and tumor characteristics on diagnostic accuracy.

次要结局

  • Imaging and genomic data analysis(Up to 3 years)
  • Response status(Up to 3 years)
  • Diagnostic accuracy by location(Up to 3 years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

PET/MR Versus CECT Scans in Imaging Patients With... | 临床试验