MedPath

Study of the Clinical Benefits of Different Formulations of Amphotericin B

Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Efficacy
Safety
Registration Number
NCT06123832
Lead Sponsor
Qianfoshan Hospital
Brief Summary

This project intends to carry out a multi-center retrospective observational real-world study to understand the current status of amphotericin B use by formulation type, compare the differences in safety and efficacy of each formulation in domestic clinical application, provide real-world evidence for clinical drug selection, and provide evidence-based evidence in support of rational clinical drug use.

Detailed Description

The researchers selected patients with amphotericin B use records discharged from five tertiary hospitals across the country from January 1, 2020 to the present, extracted data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and divided them into experimental and control groups, in order to understand the current status of amphotericin B use in each preparation type, compare the differences in the safety and efficacy of the various preparations in the domestic clinical application, and provide real-world evidence of the choice of clinical medication.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
184
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Patients discharged from January 1, 2020 to the present;
  2. Patients with a record of amphotericin B use.
Exclusion Criteria

1.Key information missing from patient studies.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall Adverse Reaction RateThrough study completion,up to half a year.

The incidence of total adverse reactions was analyzed to assess the difference in safety of amphotericin B by formulation type in domestic clinical application, to provide real-world evidence for clinical drug selection, and to provide evidence-based evidence in support of rational clinical drug use.

Pathogen clearance rateThrough study completion,up to half a year.

To assess the differences in effectiveness of amphotericin B by formulation type in domestic clinical application by analyzing the pathogen clearance rate, to provide real-world evidence for clinical dosing selection, and to provide evidence-based evidence to support rational clinical dosing.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Rui Yang,MD

🇨🇳

Jinan, Shandong, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath