Efficacy of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol following elective cesarean section, a single-center randomized controlled trial
Phase 1
Completed
- Conditions
- compare the efficacy of postoperative recovery among pregnant women scheduled for caesarean section and receiving enhanced recovery after surgery protocol (ERAS) compared with the 24 hour postoperative control group using the Thai version of the Quality of recovery questionnaire ( QoR-35).ERAS, QoR-35
- Registration Number
- TCTR20210705001
- Lead Sponsor
- Srinakharinwirot University
- Brief Summary
o difference in QoR-35, Better in pain score in ERAS group and no difference in complication after sergery
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 48
Inclusion Criteria
i)Women aged 20-40 years
ii)Singleton pregnancy without severe obstetric (Gestational diabetic mellitus) or severe medical complications such as kidney disease, asthma, heart disease, pregestational diabetic mellitus
Exclusion Criteria
i)subsequently had postpartum hemorrhage,
ii)Received (or be converted to) general anesthesia,
iii)Underwent emergency cesarean section, or iv) demonstrated unstable post-operative condition (shock, anaphylaxis, respiratory distress)
iv)Contraindication to use cefazolin, NSAIDs, metoclopramide,
v)Cannot read Thai questionnaire,
vi)Refuse to joint research
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Quality of recovery 24 hours postoperative QoR-35 scores
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 24 hours postoperative pain score 24 hours postoperative Visual analogue scale,Postoperative complication 72 hours postoperative complication of surgery and puerperium