MedPath

Malnutrition in Older Adults: An Intervention Based on Medication Review and Individual Nutritional Plan

Not Applicable
Conditions
Malnutrition
Polypharmacy
Aged
Interventions
Dietary Supplement: Individualized plan for improvement of nutrition
Drug: Systematic drug review
Registration Number
NCT04228900
Lead Sponsor
University of Oslo
Brief Summary

The project "Nutrition and Medication management in home-dwelling older adults" consist of two separate studies witch are described in the same study protocol. This is the second study in this Project. The first study (cross sectional) is described separately; Identification: 2017/12883-1

Undernutrition is common in older adults. The causes are many and include drug therapy. Drug side effects, as loss of appetite, nausea, or dry mouth, may contribute to malnutrition, impaired health and loss of function.

In patients with malnutrition or at risk for malnutrition we will evaluate an intervention consisting of:

* an "individual nutritional plan" with different measures aiming at improving nutritional status.

* a systematic drug review.

Detailed Description

The participants will be recruited by the home nursing services or by a nurse at a short-time ward in the nursing home.

The composite intervention consists has two components (A and B):

Component A: Clinical assessment and critical medication review

Drawing on information from the medical history, clinical finding according to examination made by the principal investigator (trained physician), information from the General Practitioner (GP) and the findings from blood tests, we will make a systematic and critical medication review. This systematic review has the following considerations:

* Are drug-drug unintended interactions likely to occur? Interaction analysis supported by https:// www.interaksjoner.no

* Are there use of potentially inappropriate medication? Assessed based on the Norwegian General Practice Nursing -Home criteria.

* Could nutritional related problems like loss of appetite, dry mouth and nausea, be attribute to adverse drug effects? Assessed by the list we made of drugs who often contributes to these side effects according to The Norwegian Pharmaceutical Product Compendium.

Component B: Nutritional intervention- individual nutrition plan. Drawing on the principles for good nutritional practice, and National guidelines, this component include the following considerations:

* Nutritional status by use of Mini Nutritional Assessment short form (MNA-SF), and further in- depth nutrition assessment if MNA-SF is in range 0-11.

* Assessment of the nutritional needs.

* Assess food and drink intake with a 3- day dietary record to the estimated nutritional needs.

* In collaboration with the home nurse, the participant and if possible/ necessary a next to kin, focusing on individual problems and develop an individual nutritional plan.

The project is about a controlled implementation of measures recommended in current national guidelines. We will follow a principle known as the "Nutritional Stairs", and choose interventions in the nutritional plan as close to "normal" food as possible. This means that the individual nutritional plan takes into account:

* Physical and mental disorders are diagnosed and optimal treated. (Oral health care included)

* Intervention to optimize the meal environment and meal itself, e.g., enough light in the room, specific tools to make eating possible if necessary, company

* The frequency of meals, length of night fasting, special diets as energy- and nutrient dens diets, consistency customized diet (liquid or solid food)

* Enriched food and in between meals/snacks

* Nutritional supplements

The intervention last six months, and participants in the intervention group will receive four visits at home; baseline and after 4, 12 and 24 weeks. At baseline and at week 24, the principal investigator (trained physician) and the nurse will visit the participants. At week 4 and 12, only the nurse will visit them. The control group, are visited by a nurse twice: at baseline and after 24 weeks, and are follow-up by the home nurse service and their GP "as usual".

Drop- out during the study period and reasons for "loss to follow-up (LTFU)" will be registered; e.g., moved from the municipality, acute illness that make further participation difficult, admission to long time ward in nursing home, or any other reason to withdraw participation. In the intervention group, we will on behalf of and subject to the participant's consent, make an appointment for consultation by the GP, if the clinical assessment suggests undetected diseases or diseases not optimal treated. If oral health problems are encountered, we will recommend a consultation by a dentist.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age 70 year or more
  • Receiving home nurse care each second week or more often
  • Mini Nutritional Assessment short form (MNA-SF): 0-11 point (malnourished or at risk for malnutrition)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Life expectance less than 6 month
  • Serious cognitive impairment
  • In need of enteral-/ parenteral nutrition
  • Not able to stand up for weight measure
  • The home care service are not responsible for medication delivery.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Intervention groupIndividualized plan for improvement of nutritionDrug review and tailored nutritional supply.
Intervention groupSystematic drug reviewDrug review and tailored nutritional supply.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from Baseline Body weight at 24th weekBaseline, 24th week

measurement of the participants weight

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from Baseline Health- related quality of life at 24th weekBaseline, 24th week

answered by one question:"Consider your health, would you say it is: excellent(score 5)- very good (score 4)- good (score 3)- pretty good (score 2)- bad(score 1)" minimum score 1, Maximum score 5.The higher score the better.

Change from Baseline Activity of Daily living (ADL) at 24th weekBaseline, 24th week

Assessed by Barthel“s ADL-index. Minimum score 0, Maximum score 20. The higher score the better.

Change from Baseline Admission to nursing home at 24th weekBaseline, 24th week

Changes in Number of admissions to nursing home

Change from Baseline Admission to hospital at 24th weekBaseline, 24th week

Change in Number of admissions to hospital

Change from Baseline Mini Nutritional Assessment short form (MNA-SF) at 24th weekBaseline, 24th week

minimum score 0, Maximum score 14. 0-7 indicate malnutrition, 8-11 indicate risk for malnutrition, 12-14; normal nutritional status

Change from Baseline Number of drugs in daily use at 24th weekBaseline, 24th week

Change in number of drugs in daily use

Change from Baseline Number of drugs in daily use considered inappropriate at 24th weekBaseline, 24th week

Number of drugs considered inappropriate according to the Norwegian Practice Nursing-Home criteria, se protocol page 19-20,attachment 1

Change from Baseline Number of drugs in daily with high risk causing nausea, loss of appetite, and dry mouth at 24th week.Baseline, 24th week

See list Protocol page 21-23, attachment 2

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of General Practice, Institute og Health and Society, University og Oslo

šŸ‡³šŸ‡“

Oslo, Norway

Ā© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath