A clinical trial comparing two different Orthodontic arch wires.
Phase 2
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K009- Disorder of tooth development, unspecified
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/03/024175
- Lead Sponsor
- Shubhangi jain
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Patients requiring fixed orthodontic treatment with extraction of 1st premolars.
Patients with crowding in lower anterior segment having a mandibular irregularity index 5-8.
Patients with no relevant medical history.
no recent history of intake of drugs such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with systemic diseases, active periodontal disease, spacing in lower anterior region and those who had undergone previously orthodontic treatment
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To evaluate and compare the aligning efficiency of 0.016 in superplastic Niti and 0.016 Heat activated nitiTimepoint: every 3 weeks till end of completely aligned.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To evaluate and compare the pain due to 0.016 in superplastic Niti and 0.016 Heat activated niti in aligning phaseTimepoint: 24 hrs and 1 week after placement of wire;To evaluate and compare the root resorption due to 0.016 in superplastic Niti and 0.016 Heat activated nitiTimepoint: before wire placement and post alignment