MedPath

Fuel Up: Onderzoek naar het herstel van burn-out door meer inzicht in positieve emoties.

Conditions
burn out PsyMate positive affect negative affect UBOS UWES feedback bevlogenheid work engagement daily life experience sampling
Registration Number
NL-OMON26760
Lead Sponsor
J. van Os, head of department Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, University of Maastricht, the Netherlands
Brief Summary

/A

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Pending
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria

1. 18-65 years;

2. Meeting the criteria of burn out (`Exhaustion+1' criterion) as defined by Brenninkmeyer and Van Yperen;

Exclusion Criteria

Diagnosis of non-affective psychosis (e.g. schizophrenia), schizoaffective disorder (current) or a bipolar disorder. Because burn out is not known as a psychiatric syndrome in a current psychiatric classification system, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) is used to determine the psychiatric classification.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
1. Main outcome measures are pre and post intervention changes in PA, NA and person-tailored strategies as measured with the PsyMate are the main outcome measures for this aim. Multilevel regression analyses are used;<br /><br>2. Pre – post intervention change in burn out symptomatology as measured with the UBOS questionnaire and Work Engagement as measured with the UWES questionnaire at the end of the intervention, using a t-test;<br /><br>3. Follow up measures (after 12 and 24 weeks) are changes in burn out symptomatology as measured with the UBOS questionnaire and Work Engagement as measured with the UWES questionnaire.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
1. This economic evaluation will involve a combination of a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and a cost-utility analysis (CUA). In a CEA effects are presented in clinical outcomes (in our study increase of work engagement, decrease of burn out and relapse). The primary outcomes measure for the cost-utility analysis will be Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs), based on the EuroQol utility scores, which is measured with the TiC-P, PRODISQ and EQ-5D. The health care consumption and costs are compared between the two groups on base-line and at 12 and 24 weeks follow up;<br /><br>2. Changes in daily life experiences and their relation with burn out levels at follow up are measured with the Psymate.
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath