MedPath

Comparing the Efficacy Between Lignocaine Given Via MADgic Atomizer and Lignocaine Pump Spray

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Hemodynamic Instability
Sore Throat
Cough
Hoarseness
Interventions
Device: Lignocaine pump spray
Device: MADgic Atomizer
Registration Number
NCT06213116
Lead Sponsor
Universiti Sains Malaysia
Brief Summary

Comparing the efficacy between Lignocaine given via MADgic Atomizer and Lignocaine Pump Spray pre endotracheal intubation in adult undergoing General Anesthesia.

Detailed Description

Comparing the efficacy of Lignocaine given via 2 device (Lignocaine Spray and MADGIC Atomizer) on hemodinamic parameters postintubations and severity grading of post operative sore throat, cough and hoarseness of voice.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
125
Inclusion Criteria
  • Adult with the age of 18 to 65 years old
  • Gender of both male and female
  • Planned for elective surgery scheduled at General Operation Theatre that require elective intubation for general anesthesia
  • American Society Anaesthesiologist (ASA) preoperative physical status assessment of 1 and 2
  • Airway assessment Malampati scoring 1and 2.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnancy
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to Lignocaine
  • Pre existing sore throat or hoarseness of voice identified during preoperative assessment.
  • The use of airway device other than endotracheal tube (ETT) such Laryngeal Mask airway/Supraglottic Device'
  • Oral and neck surgery

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Lignocaine SprayLignocaine pump sprayGroup S (Spray) acting as Control Group: Patients receiving Lignocaine 30 mg (3 puffs) given via 10mg Lignocain Pump Spray prior to endotracheal intubation.
MADgic AtomizerMADgic AtomizerGroup M(MADgic) acting as Intervention Group: Patients receiving Lignocaine 30mg (3 alliquotes) given via MADgic Laryngotracheal Atomization Device prior to endotracheal intubation.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Severity Grading of Post Operative Sore Throat24 hours

Numbers of participants complaining incidence of sore throat postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Severity Grading of Post Operative Cough24 hours

Numbers of participants complaining incidence of cough postoperatively

Severity grading of Hoarseness of voice24 hours

Numbers of participants complaining incidence of hoarseness of voice postoperatively

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Science Malaysia Hospital

🇲🇾

Kubang kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath