Comparing the Efficacy Between Lignocaine Given Via MADgic Atomizer and Lignocaine Pump Spray
- Conditions
- Hemodynamic InstabilitySore ThroatCoughHoarseness
- Interventions
- Device: Lignocaine pump sprayDevice: MADgic Atomizer
- Registration Number
- NCT06213116
- Lead Sponsor
- Universiti Sains Malaysia
- Brief Summary
Comparing the efficacy between Lignocaine given via MADgic Atomizer and Lignocaine Pump Spray pre endotracheal intubation in adult undergoing General Anesthesia.
- Detailed Description
Comparing the efficacy of Lignocaine given via 2 device (Lignocaine Spray and MADGIC Atomizer) on hemodinamic parameters postintubations and severity grading of post operative sore throat, cough and hoarseness of voice.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 125
- Adult with the age of 18 to 65 years old
- Gender of both male and female
- Planned for elective surgery scheduled at General Operation Theatre that require elective intubation for general anesthesia
- American Society Anaesthesiologist (ASA) preoperative physical status assessment of 1 and 2
- Airway assessment Malampati scoring 1and 2.
- Pregnancy
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to Lignocaine
- Pre existing sore throat or hoarseness of voice identified during preoperative assessment.
- The use of airway device other than endotracheal tube (ETT) such Laryngeal Mask airway/Supraglottic Device'
- Oral and neck surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Lignocaine Spray Lignocaine pump spray Group S (Spray) acting as Control Group: Patients receiving Lignocaine 30 mg (3 puffs) given via 10mg Lignocain Pump Spray prior to endotracheal intubation. MADgic Atomizer MADgic Atomizer Group M(MADgic) acting as Intervention Group: Patients receiving Lignocaine 30mg (3 alliquotes) given via MADgic Laryngotracheal Atomization Device prior to endotracheal intubation.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Severity Grading of Post Operative Sore Throat 24 hours Numbers of participants complaining incidence of sore throat postoperatively
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Severity Grading of Post Operative Cough 24 hours Numbers of participants complaining incidence of cough postoperatively
Severity grading of Hoarseness of voice 24 hours Numbers of participants complaining incidence of hoarseness of voice postoperatively
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Science Malaysia Hospital
🇲🇾Kubang kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia