Prospective Physician-Initiated Observational Study of The Contact Detection System (CDS) in Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Ablation Using the Niobe™ Remote Magnetic Navigation System
- Conditions
- Atrial FibrillationCatheter Ablation
- Interventions
- Device: CDS box connection of the Niobe™ Remote Magnetic Navigation System
- Registration Number
- NCT03103945
- Lead Sponsor
- Erasmus Medical Center
- Brief Summary
This observational study evaluates peri-procedural results of the Niobe™ Remote Magnetic Navigation (RMN) ES system using the contact detection system (CDS) in patients undergoing standard of care radiofrequency ablation of cardiac arrhythmias.
The objective of this observational study is to confirm system performance of the CDS and that it does not alter pacing, electrocardiograms, or mapping during RF ablation procedures.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
- patients with a clinical indication for RF ablation of cardiac arrhythmias with the Niobe Remote Magnetic Navigation system
- patients referred to one of the participating ablation centers
- written informed consent
- presence of a atrial thrombus or left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus seen on (contrast) echocardiography or MRI
- contra-indication for general anesthesia
- age below 18 years
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Patients with cardiac arrhythmias undergoing RF ablation CDS box connection of the Niobe™ Remote Magnetic Navigation System Patients with cardiac arrhythmias will be undergoing RF ablation using the Niobe Remote Magnetic Navigation System with CDS as their standard of care. System performance data will only be collected during the RF ablation procedure. Outcome measures will be evaluated with the CDS connected and without the CDS connected within all patients.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pacing thresholds One day - during ablation procedure Pacing thresholds of three separate areas of the right atrium without CDS box connected and pacing thresholds of the same three areas with CDS box connected
Pacing capture One day - during ablation procedure Pacing capture of three separate areas of the right atrium without CDS box connected and pacing capture of the same three areas with CDS box connected
Electrocardiograms 10 months - ECGs will be evaluated after inclusion is completed Difference between and disturbance of the intracardiac electrocardiograms without the CDS box connected versus with the CDS box connected, evaluated by two independent and blinded electrophysiologists
Mapping quality One day - during ablation procedure Physician's and technician's subjective score of the quality of mapping the right atrium without CDS box connected and with CDS box connected
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of procedure related major adverse events, attributed to the CDS system 30 days Major adverse events: death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or coronary artery damage, major bleeding - type III and V, abdominal bleeding, tamponade \> 80cm3, late tamponade, ischemic cerebral event
Number of procedure related minor adverse events, attributed to the CDS system 30 days Minor adverse events: post procedural precordial pain, phrenic nerve injury, minor bleeding - type II
Number of acute procedure succes 1 day - during ablation procedure Number of procedures with successful electrical isolation of ablated area
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Erasmus MC
🇳🇱Rotterdam, Zuid Holland, Netherlands