跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2023/04/051256
CTRI/2023/04/051256尚未招募Unknown

A comparative study on the efficacy of ultrasound based versus age based calculation of uncuffed endotracheal tube size in pediatric patients.

Dr Upashana Das0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
Unknown
状态
尚未招募
发起方

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

入选标准

  • 1. Age not less than 2 years and not more than 6 years. 2. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical status 1 and 2. 3. Children posted for elective surgery. 4. Children planned for general anesthesia requiring intubation. 5. Availability of informed consent.

排除标准

  • 1. Those undergoing maxillofacial or cardiac surgeries. 2. Those with syndromic and genetic conditions and congenital malformations especially involving facial dysmorphias. 3. Child with stridor. 4. Child with acute respiratory tract infections. 5. Those with decreased atlanto-occipital joint mobility. 6. Those with neuromuscular disorders. 7. Those with neck trauma. 8. Those cases which take longer than 30 seconds of apneic time.

研究者

发起方
Dr Upashana Das

相似试验

Age based formula vs Ultrasound assessment: Which... | 临床试验