Comparison of Lipophilic Versus Hydrophilic Statins on Patients With Heart Failure
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT03255044
- Lead Sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Brief Summary
There is a controversy whether statins are beneficial in patients with heart failure or not. Trials in which lipophilic statins have been used revealed positive results, unlike major studies where hydrophilic statins were administered. This trial is designed to compare the effects of lipophilic versus hydrophilic statin use in patients with heart failure.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 85
- older than 18 years (of both sexes)
- diagnosed with stable chronic heart failure NYHA class II-III
- ejection fraction < 40 % as assessed by 2D echocardiography
- who have been optimized on Guideline Directed treatment for heart failure for at least a month prior to enrolling.
- Known hypersensitivity to statin
- Treatment with statins during the past month prior to study.
- Serum creatinine > 3 mg/dl
- Significant liver disease: liver enzymes 2.5 folds the upper normal limit
- Malignancy
- Pregnancy or lactation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Hydrophilic statin guideline directed therapy Rosuvastatin 20 mg administered daily in addition to guideline directed therapy for heart failure. Lipophilic statin guideline directed therapy Atorvastatin 40 mg administered daily in addition to guideline directed therapy for heart failure. Hydrophilic statin Rosuvastatin Rosuvastatin 20 mg administered daily in addition to guideline directed therapy for heart failure. Lipophilic statin Atorvastatin Atorvastatin 40 mg administered daily in addition to guideline directed therapy for heart failure.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Left Ventricular End-systolic volume (LVESV) 6 months Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) 6 months Left Ventricular End-diastolic volume (LVEDV) 6 months cardiac markers 6 months NT pro BNP (N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide) sST2 (soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire( MLHFQ) 6 months Packer composite outcome 6 months * Patients are considered improved if at the final visit they experienced a favorable change in NYHA functional class or in the patient global assessment: markedly/moderately improved (or both) but did not experience any major adverse clinical events during the course of the trial (death or hospitalization).
* Patients are considered worse if they experienced a major clinical event during the duration of treatment or reported worsening of their NYHA class or global assessment at the final visit.
* Patients are considered unchanged if they are neither improved nor worse.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ain Shams University Hospital Cardiology Rehab Unit
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt