MedPath

Comparison of Lipophilic Versus Hydrophilic Statins on Patients With Heart Failure

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Heart Failure
Interventions
Other: guideline directed therapy
Registration Number
NCT03255044
Lead Sponsor
Ain Shams University
Brief Summary

There is a controversy whether statins are beneficial in patients with heart failure or not. Trials in which lipophilic statins have been used revealed positive results, unlike major studies where hydrophilic statins were administered. This trial is designed to compare the effects of lipophilic versus hydrophilic statin use in patients with heart failure.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
85
Inclusion Criteria
  • older than 18 years (of both sexes)
  • diagnosed with stable chronic heart failure NYHA class II-III
  • ejection fraction < 40 % as assessed by 2D echocardiography
  • who have been optimized on Guideline Directed treatment for heart failure for at least a month prior to enrolling.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Known hypersensitivity to statin
  • Treatment with statins during the past month prior to study.
  • Serum creatinine > 3 mg/dl
  • Significant liver disease: liver enzymes 2.5 folds the upper normal limit
  • Malignancy
  • Pregnancy or lactation

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Hydrophilic statinguideline directed therapyRosuvastatin 20 mg administered daily in addition to guideline directed therapy for heart failure.
Lipophilic statinguideline directed therapyAtorvastatin 40 mg administered daily in addition to guideline directed therapy for heart failure.
Hydrophilic statinRosuvastatinRosuvastatin 20 mg administered daily in addition to guideline directed therapy for heart failure.
Lipophilic statinAtorvastatinAtorvastatin 40 mg administered daily in addition to guideline directed therapy for heart failure.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Left Ventricular End-systolic volume (LVESV)6 months
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)6 months
Left Ventricular End-diastolic volume (LVEDV)6 months
cardiac markers6 months

NT pro BNP (N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide) sST2 (soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire( MLHFQ)6 months
Packer composite outcome6 months

* Patients are considered improved if at the final visit they experienced a favorable change in NYHA functional class or in the patient global assessment: markedly/moderately improved (or both) but did not experience any major adverse clinical events during the course of the trial (death or hospitalization).

* Patients are considered worse if they experienced a major clinical event during the duration of treatment or reported worsening of their NYHA class or global assessment at the final visit.

* Patients are considered unchanged if they are neither improved nor worse.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ain Shams University Hospital Cardiology Rehab Unit

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath