MedPath

Patient Outcomes Collection: How Can we do Better?

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Shoulder Pain
Registration Number
NCT03653455
Lead Sponsor
Rush University Medical Center
Brief Summary

Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are widely used by clinical providers as important tools to help inform their clinical and research practice, and to improve quality of care for patients. In this study, the investigators aim to investigate ways by which patient PRO completion rates may be improved.

Detailed Description

Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are widely used by clinical providers as important tools to help inform their clinical and research practice, and to improve quality of care for patients. In addition, PROs are increasingly cited as a tool in measuring surgical performance and the value of health care services being delivered. The quality of data captured by PROs is, however, largely dependent on patients' response rates, both pre- and post-operatively. For pre-operative surveys, higher response rates may be achieved as patients may be reminded to complete their surveys at an office visit or prior to surgery. However, patient non-compliance presents a major challenge post-operatively, undermining PRO data integrity.

As clinical practices have moved to using PROs for all patients, rather than just a research tool, automated systems have been developed to deliver and collect PRO electronically. However, while automation has helped streamline PRO administration and data collection, this hasn't always translated into obtaining better PRO compliance rates. In an attempt to improve response rates, efforts have been made to reduce patient burden (by reducing the number of questions asked, for example), to regularly remind patients to complete their forms (either by email or telephone), or even offer patients monetary or non-monetary incentives.

Despite these measures' variable success, however, achieving high response rates remains a challenge. This, in part, is due to the fact these platforms depend heavily on patients receiving the request and their willingness to participate in the program, often long after their care is completed. As data are increasingly used to measure physician performance and quality, as well as to determine reimbursement, low patient compliance rates remain a significant impediment and affect the validity of the data.

In this study, the invetigators hypothesize that direct patient engagement can improve patient compliance with automated PRO capture.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
400
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients scheduled to undergo shoulder arthroscopy for rotator cuff condition (sub-acromial decompression, distal clavicle resection, biceps tenodesis, partial or full thickness rotator cuff tear repair or debridement) will be eligible for enrollment in the appropriate cohort. There will be no restrictions to this enrollment apart from that presented in the exclusions below.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Minors or those over the age of 80
  2. Subjects lacking English proficiency to complete the PROs of interest.
  3. Past or current medical history that would preclude patients from undergoing surgery.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Does patient engagement, through education or monetary incentivization, increase PRO compliance rate at 1 year after surgery, when compared to PRO compliance rate before surgery?Change in PRO compliance rate between pre-surgery and 1-year post surgery

Patients will discuss the importance of PROs and how they can be used to predict their health outcome with their care provider. Alternatively, patients may receive amazon gift cards if they complete their PROs before surgery, as well as at 6-months and 1-yr after surgery. Three established PROs \[American Shoulder And Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and the Veteran Rand 12-Item and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (VR/SF12)\] will be automatically emailed to patients using an electronic platform (OBERD). Rate at which these forms are completed (compliance rate) before surgery, as well 1-year post surgery will be monitored through OBERD.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Effects of technological literacy on PRO compliance rate.Change in PRO compliance rate between pre-surgery and 1-year post surgery

Assess how technological literacy might change PRO compliance from baseline (before surgery) to 1-year after surgery. Three established PROs \[American Shoulder And Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and the Veteran Rand 12-Item and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (VR/SF12)\] will be automatically emailed to patients using an electronic platform (OBERD). Rate at which these forms are completed (compliance rate) before surgery, as well 1-year post surgery will be monitored through OBERD.

Effects of age on PRO compliance rate.Change in PRO compliance rate between pre-surgery and 1-year post surgery

Assess how patients' age might change PRO compliance from baseline (before surgery) to 1-year after surgery. Three established PROs \[American Shoulder And Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and the Veteran Rand 12-Item and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (VR/SF12)\] will be automatically emailed to patients using an electronic platform (OBERD). Rate at which these forms are completed (compliance rate) before surgery, as well 1-year post surgery will be monitored through OBERD.

Effects of English proficiency on PRO compliance rate.Change in PRO compliance rate between pre-surgery and 1-year post surgery

Assess how English proficiency might change PRO compliance from baseline (before surgery) to 1-year after surgery. Three established PROs \[American Shoulder And Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and the Veteran Rand 12-Item and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (VR/SF12)\] will be automatically emailed to patients using an electronic platform (OBERD). Rate at which these forms are completed (compliance rate) before surgery, as well 1-year post surgery will be monitored through OBERD.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Carla M. Edwards

🇺🇸

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Carla M. Edwards
🇺🇸Evanston, Illinois, United States
Carla M. Edwards, PhD
Contact
312-563-5735
carla_edwards@rush.edu
Brian Forsythe, MD
Sub Investigator
Brian Cole, MD, MBA
Sub Investigator
Adam Yanke, MD, PhD
Sub Investigator
Gregory Nicholson, MD
Sub Investigator

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.