Adjunctive Periodontal Treatment With Coenzyme Q10 in Association With Probiotics for Pregnant Women
- Conditions
- Pregnancy RelatedPeriodontal Diseases
- Registration Number
- NCT06308497
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Pavia
- Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to assess if probiotic supplementation can be effective in reducing periodontal clinical parameters in a 6-month study on pregnant patients.
- Detailed Description
The aim of the study is to assess if probiotic supplementation can be effective in reducing periodontal clinical parameters in a 6-month study on pregnant patients. Patients' enrollment will be conducted according to inclusion criteria.
At the first visit, periodontal parameters will be recorded: Plaque Index (PI), recession (R) Bleeding on Probing (BoP), modified Marginal Gingival Index (mMGI), Papillary Marginal Gingival (PMGI), Plaque Control Record ( PCR %), Approximal Plaque Index (API), Clinical Attachment loss (CAL) and Probing Pocket Depth (PPD).
Professional debridement will be conducted with piezoelectric instrumentation and air-flow administration with glycine powders.
Subsequently, patients will be randomly divided into two groups:
* the Probiotic group, in which patients will undergo daily probiotic supplementation in addition to the standard treatment
* the Control group, in which patients will undergo standard treatment
Professional debridement will be repeated every 3 months. Periodontal index evaluation will be conducted at the baseline (T0), after 1 month (T1), after 3 months (T2), and after 6 months (T3).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- women at the 4th month of pregnancy
- presence of cardiac pacemaker
- neurological and psychiatric diseases
- patients taking bisphosphonates during the previous 12 months from the beginning of the study
- patients undergoing anticancer therapy.
- patients with poor compliance.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Clinical Attachment Loss (CAL) Baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months Measurement (in mm) of the position of the gingival margin in relation to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ).
Change in Plaque Index Baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months Scoring criteria:
0 = no plaque;
1. = thin plaque layer at the gingival margin, only detectable by scraping with a probe;
2. = moderate layer of plaque along the gingival margin; interdental spaces free, but plaque is visible to the naked eye;
3. = abundant plaque along the gingival margin; interdental spaces filled with plaque.Change in Recession (R) Baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months Distance (in mm) between the gingival margin and the amelo-cemental junction.
Change in Bleeding on Probing (BoP) Baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months Site-specific assessment of the presence or absence of gum bleeding after the insertion of the periodontal probe for the detection of PPD, detected on 6 sites.
Percentage of sites with bleeding on probing determines the BOP%.Change in Papillary Marginal Gingival Index (PMGI) Baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months Numerical score from 0 to 3 of gingival inflammation. Papille and gingival margins (vestibular and lingual) are given a score from 0 to 3. The score is given by the total amount of inflamed sites on the total of examined sites.
Change in modified Marginal Gingival Index (mMGI) Baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months Scoring criteria:
0 = Absence of inflammation
1. = Mild inflammation (marginal or papillary unit)
2. = Mild inflammation (entire marginal and papillary unit)
3. = Moderate inflammation
4. = Severe inflammationChange in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) Baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months Evaluation (in mm) of the depth of the gingival sulcus, through a millimeter periodontal probe; it is detected from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus or periodontal pocket, evaluated at 6 sites.
Change in API - Approximal Plaque Index Baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months Following application of disclosing, a simple yes/no decision is made concerning whether the interproximal surfaces are covered by plaque (+) or not (-). The proportion of plaque-covered interproximal spaces is expressed as a percentage. Usually, in a given quadrant the interproximal spaces are scored from only one aspect (i.e. from the facial - Q2 and Q4 - or from the oral aspect - Q1 and Q3).
Change in Plaque Control Record (PCR%) Baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months % assessment of the amount of plaque on dental surfaces; it is detected on 4 surfaces: distal, mesial, vestibular, lingual / palatal. The number of sites with plaque is divided by the total number of sites available in the mouth and multiplied by 100. Results indicate the index as a percentage.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Unit of Dental Hygiene - Section of Dentistry - Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatrics - University of Pavia
🇮🇹Pavia, Lombardy, Italy
Unit of Dental Hygiene - Section of Dentistry - Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatrics - University of Pavia🇮🇹Pavia, Lombardy, Italy