Comparison of IMES Versus DN on ATrPs of AC
- Conditions
- Shoulder Pain
- Interventions
- Other: intramusuar electrical stimulationOther: Dry needling
- Registration Number
- NCT06302829
- Lead Sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Brief Summary
The aim of our study to compare DN and IMES for pressure pain threshold, ROM and the shoulder function in active trigger points with adhesive capsulitis. This study will add to the growing body of knowledge that if these two techniques yield comparable outcomes and if one technique is superior to the other, which should be the alternative of therapy. Moreover, it would add to the society as there are very limited researches done in Pakistan using needling for trigger points in adhesive capsulitis.
- Detailed Description
In literature review 2021, they were see the short-term effect of dry needling of myofascial trigger point in patient with adhesive capsulitis. They conclude MTrPs with DN technique were improve pain, ROM, disability, and PPT along with conventional physiotherapy management among patient with adhesive capsulitis In another study 2021, in their study they were see the effect of dry needling and muscle energy technique separately in patient suffering shoulder impingement syndrome on active trigger point of infraspinatus. In their study they conclude dry needling is an effective treatment to treat the active trigger point in patient suffering from shoulder impingement syndrome In another study 2023, in their study they see impact of dry needling with electrical stimulation on pain and disability in patient with musculoskeletal shoulder pain. They do the systemic review of 5 studies to see the beneficial effect of dry needling and IMES. They conclude that the significant improvement in pain, ROM, and functional disability in patient with musculoskeletal shoulder pain In 2021 study, in their study they were see the effect of Dry Needling with percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patient with Myofascial neck pain. They were applying the dry needling on myofascial trigger point present in upper trapezius in patient with Myofascial neck pain They conclude that electric nerve stimulation will improve disability and pain intensity in patient with myofascial neck pain In another study 2021, in their study they see the effect of intramuscular stimulation along with dry needling in patient with adhesive capsulitis. They target the shoulder girdle muscle and paraspinal muscle (C3 to C7). They conclude that IMES and dry needling were improve pain, ROM and functional disability in patient with adhesive capsulitis In another study 2021, in their study they were target the deltoid myofascial trigger point to improve pain they conclude that dry needling and IMES were enhance blood circulation and cervical and shoulder ROM in MTrPs patient IMES and dry needling according to literature review is an effective treatment to treat the trigger points present at various points in different musculoskeletal conditions. It reduces the shoulder pain severity and upper limb disability by deactivating the active MTrPs and improve the shoulder ROM in patient with adhesive capsulitis. Hence there is lack of evidence to allow conclusions to be drawn about the effectiveness of Dry needling when compared with intramuscular electrical stimulation for adhesive capsulitis in term of pressure pain threshold and shoulder function in active trigger points
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 44
-
• Age 40 to 60 year of both genders
- Diagnosed patients of stage 3 Adhesive capsulitis with type I and II diabetes
- Involvement of at least 3 shoulder girdle muscles in Active MTrPs (subscapularis, latissimus dorsi, deltoid (anterior, middle, posterior)
- Active MTrPs in shoulder girdle muscles (subscapularis, supraspinatus, deltoid (anterior, middle, posterior), teres minor, latissimus dorsi)
- Reproduction of the patient's symptoms at active trigger point, Taut band, Hypersensitive spot, Referred pain pattern, local twitch response
- Minimum 60 degrees of active/passive shoulder abduction range of movement.
- Systemic inflammatory joint disease of shoulder joint (RA, OA polymyalgia rheumatic)
- Cerebral Vascular Accident
- Fibromyalgia, neurological deficits of upper limb (Nerve root entrapment, Cervical radiculopathy, Thoracic outlet syndrome)
- History of Fracture, Dislocation, Acute soft tissue injury, Acute bursitis
- Avascular necrosis of humeral head or visceral referred pain to shoulder
- Pregnancy, Hypothyroidism, skin infection
- Patients who are using Antiplatelet Therapy with in past 3 days of study
- Extreme fear of needles
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Intramuscular Electrical stimulation intramusuar electrical stimulation Myofascial trigger point would be targeted by direct intramuscular electrical stimulation by using direct electrode placement method, where anode pole and the cathode pole of the stimulator connected to the needles of the MTrPs of the shoulder girdle muscles using the alligator clip connector in which both electrodes are on the muscle belly in which anode pole at proximal end and cathode pole at the distal end along the musculotendinous junction. The special programmed comfy stim (a double channeled multipurpose electrical stimulator) was used to deliver electrical impulses with following parameters; pulse duration 80µs, frequency 100HZ, and time duration for 10 min Dry Needling Dry needling DN for the MTrPs will be performed over the identified trigger points locations at a suitable angle. The needles of suitable length and thickness (30-mm), depending on the depth of the MTrPs location inserted into the shoulder girdle muscles to deactivate the active MTrPs. Subsequently, the inserted needles moved to-and-fro direction to elicit the local twitch responses, which further reaffirms the ideal placement of needle into the MTrPs. After the twitch response obtained, the dry needles were kept within the muscles approximately for 10 minutes. Dry needling was performed subscapularis, latissimus dorsi, supraspinatus, deltoid, teres minor.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Algometer (pressure pain threshold) 3rd week This tool can be used to assess the participant pressure pain at baseline ,2nd week,3rd week post assessment. Pressure pain threshold is measured at active trigger point at subscapularis, deltoid (ant, middle, post), latissimus dorsi, teres minor, supraspinatus. The PPT are measured by mean and standard deviation kg\\cm2
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ASES Questionnaire; (American shoulder and elbow surgeons scale) 3rd week Changes from baseline,2nd week,3rd week, ASES Scale scoring was done at 2 level, pain questionnaire 5× (10-Q7 value), ADL Questionnaire (5× (raw score) divided by 3, final scoring is done by adding pain score and ADL score. A total 100-point scale Minimum score 0 which mean worst shoulder function and maximum score 100 which mean better shoulder function.
ROM Shoulder (Abduction) 3rd week Changes from baseline,2nd week,3rd week ROM range of motion of shoulder abduction was taken
ROM Shoulder (External rotation) 3rd week Changes from baseline,2nd week,3rd week ROM range of motion of shoulder External rotation was taken with the help of Digital Goniometer
ROM Shoulder (Flexion) 3rd week Changes from baseline,2nd week,3rd week ROM range of motion of shoulder flexion was taken
ROM Shoulder (Internal Rotation) 3rd week Changes from baseline,2nd week,3rd week ROM range of motion of shoulder Internal rotation was taken with the help of Digital Goniometer
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Railway general hopsital
🇵🇰Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan