跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06438081
NCT06438081招募中4 期

Comparison Between Propess (Dinoprostone Controlled Release Pessary) and Cook Double-balloon Catheter for Cervical Priming: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The University of Hong Kong1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 28 人开始时间: 2024年6月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
招募中
入组人数
28
试验地点
1
主要终点
Priming to delivery interval

研究概览

简要总结

The investigators aimed to compare efficacy and safety of Propess versus Cooks double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening with an unfavorable cervix in term pregnancy.

详细描述

Previous studies focused on use of PGE2 instead of Propess, which is a preparation of PGE2 packaged in a hydrogel polymer matrix and release 10mg dinoprostone at 0.3mg per hour for 24 hours. Compared with PGE2, Propess can achieve a shorter induction-to-birth interval, a higher rate of vaginal delivery within 24 hours, and a smaller number of vaginal examinations during delivery. However local studies comparing the efficacy and satisfaction of cervical priming between Cook double-balloon catheter and Propess were lacking. The investigators aimed to compare efficacy and safety of Propess versus Cooks double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening with an unfavorable cervix in term pregnancy.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 50 Years(Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Viable singleton pregnancy
  • •Cephalic presentation
  • •Bishop score <7
  • •At term (>=37+0 weeks of gestation)
  • •Nulliparous women

排除标准

  • •Gestation <37weeks
  • •Multiple pregnancy
  • •Bishop score <7
  • •Malpresentation
  • •Contraindication to vaginal delivery
  • •Previous Caesarean section
  • •History of myomectomy
  • •Maternal fever
  • •Suspected infection
  • •Abnormal fetal heart-rate patterns
  • •Rupture of membranes
  • •Intrauterine growth restriction
  • •Not fit for giving consent
  • •Allergic to Propess or PGE2

研究组 & 干预措施

Cook double-balloon catheter

Active Comparator

Participant is placed in lithotomy position, then to clean vulval and vaginal area, followed by inserting vaginal speculum. Cook double-balloon catheter will be inserted under standard technique. Doctor or midwife guide the cervical ripening balloon with stylet to pass through the cervix. Uterine balloon should be place above level of internal os, then to remove the stylet before further advancing the catheter. Cook double-balloon catheter is further advancing through the cervix until both balloons entered cervical canal. Uterine and vaginal balloons are both inflated with up to 80ml normal saline according to manufacturer recommendation. Maximal duration of balloon placement will be 12 hours. If cervix remains unfavorable after Cook double-catheter balloons, she will be given another Cook double-catheter balloons priming the next day. If cervix remains unfavourable after two balloon priming, elective Caesarean section will be advised.

干预措施: Cook double-balloon catheter (Combination Product)

Propess

Placebo Comparator

Participant will be firstly confirmed reactive tracing and without regular contraction by non-stress test for 20mins. Propess will be checked its integrity and applied with lubricating jelly before insertion. Propess is inserted to the posterior vaginal fornix. Woman should inform medical staff if they have leaking sensation. After insertion, woman will be advised to lie down and perform non-stress test for 2 hours. Propess will be removed after 24 hours post insertion. Cervical assessment is performed the next day after removal of Propess. Patient with favourable cervix, i.e. Bishop score >= 7, will start artificial rupture of membrane and syntocinon infusion. Patient with unfavorable cervix, i.e. Bishop score <7 is arranged another day of priming by PGE2. If the cervix remains unfavorable after 2 days of pharmacological priming, women will be given a rest day or continued priming by Cook double-balloon catheter.

干预措施: Cook double-balloon catheter (Combination Product)

结局指标

主要结局

Priming to delivery interval

时间窗: 1 year

Time for priming (device placement) to delivery interval

次要结局

  • Suspected intrauterine infection rate(1 year)
  • Caesarean section rate(1 year)
  • Need of induction with oxytocin(1 year)
  • Vaginal delivery within 24 hours after priming(1 year)
  • Priming to induction interval(1 year)
  • Failed induction rate(1 year)
  • Length of hospital stay(1 year)
  • Vaginal delivery rate(1 year)
  • Uterine hyperstimulation(1 year)
  • Amount of oxytocin use(1 year)
  • Malpresentation after priming(1 year)
  • Primary postpartum haemorrhage(1 year)
  • Maternal satisfaction with the procedure(1 year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验