Comparison of placement of Oxygen secured tube inside airway using unchannelled King Vision video laryngoscope and Tuoren video laryngoscopes with neck immobilisation done manually
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: 4- Measurement and Monitoring
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/06/025993
- Lead Sponsor
- Jawaharlal Institue of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research JIPMER
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. Patients scheduled for elective surgeries requiring general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation
2. American social Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification grade I to III, age between 18 to 70 years
Exclusion Criteria
1.BMI greater than or equal to 30
2. Limitation of neck extension
3. Craniofacial anomaly
4. Upper airway disease
5. Cervical spine pathology
6. An increased risk of regurgitation or pulmonary aspiration
7. History of difficult tracheal intubation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the rate of successful first attempt intubation with King vision video laryngoscope and Tuoren video laryngoscopes with manual inline stabilisation.Timepoint: Time taken for insertion of laryngoscope blade till appearance of capnography square waveform in the monitor
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.To compare time required for intubation between two groups <br/ ><br>2. To measure intubation difficulty score between two groups <br/ ><br>3. To compare haemodynamic response in both groups <br/ ><br>4 . To compare POGO scoreTimepoint: 1. Time taken for insertion of laryngoscope blade till appearance of capnography square wave form in monitor <br/ ><br>2. IDS score <br/ ><br>3. To compare haemodynamic response using mean arterial pressure and heart rate <br/ ><br>4. Percentage of glottis opening score