MedPath

Implant Primary Stability and Ridge Dimensional Changes Utilizing the Osseodensification Protocol

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Dental Implants
Interventions
Device: standard drilling (SD) protocol (NobelReplace® Conical)
Device: OsseoDensification (OD) protocol
Registration Number
NCT05283928
Lead Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare ridge dimensional changes between densification and standard drilling protocols and to compare primary and secondary stability of implants placed by bone densification and standard drilling protocols

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
15
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients who understand and agree to this study.
  • Adequate Oral hygiene
  • One or more edentulous spaces, which are 10 weeks or longer after extractions
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnancy.
  • Smoking of more than 5 cigarettes/day.
  • History of alcoholism or drug abuse during the last 5 years.
  • Uncontrolled Hypertension or diabetes.
  • Patient with malignant tumor.
  • Patients on daily dose of steroids.
  • Patients with history of chemotherapy or radiation for the last 12 months.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
standard drilling (SD) protocolstandard drilling (SD) protocol (NobelReplace® Conical)-
OsseoDensification (OD) protocolOsseoDensification (OD) protocol-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Bone Ridge Width at Crestday of implant surgery

bone ridge width will be measured using a Caliper

Change in Bone Ridge Width at 5mm Apical From Crestday of implant surgery

bone ridge width will be measured using a Caliper

Change in Bone Ridge Width at 10mm Apical From Crestday of implant surgery

bone ridge width will be measured using a Caliper

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Primary Stability of the Implants as Measured by the Insertion Torque Valuesday of implant surgery

Insertion torque refers to the force used to insert an implant into bone, and it is reported in units of Newton-Centimeters (N-cms).

Primary Stability of the Implants as Indicated by the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) as Measured by the Resonance Frequency Analysis Using the Ostell ISQ Meter Baseline(After Implant Placement)baseline(after implant placement)

The Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) value is a measurement used to assess the stability of dental implants. It is obtained by resonance frequency analysis and ranges from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating greater stability.

Primary Stability of the Implants as Indicated by the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) as Measured by the Resonance Frequency Analysis Using the Ostell ISQ Meter 3 Weeks After Implant Placement3 weeks after implant placement

The Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) value is a measurement used to assess the stability of dental implants. It is obtained by resonance frequency analysis and ranges from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating greater stability.

Primary Stability of the Implants as Indicated by the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) as Measured by the Resonance Frequency Analysis Using the Ostell ISQ Meter 6 Weeks After Implant Placement6 weeks after implant placement

The Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) value is a measurement used to assess the stability of dental implants. It is obtained by resonance frequency analysis and ranges from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating greater stability.

Primary Stability of the Implants as Indicated by the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) as Measured by the Resonance Frequency Analysis Using the Ostell ISQ Meter 12 Weeks After Implant Placement12 weeks after implant placement

The Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) value is a measurement used to assess the stability of dental implants. It is obtained by resonance frequency analysis and ranges from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating greater stability.

Volume of the Ridge as Assessed by the Cone Beam Computer Tomography (CBCT)6 months post implantation
Percent Change of Buccal Bone Thickness as Assessed by the Cone Beam Computer Tomography at 1.5 mm From the Implant Platform6 months post implantation

The buccal bone thickness (BBT) was measured using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The percentage change in BBT was calculated by comparing the post-implant measurements to baseline values, with positive percentages indicating an increase in thickness and negative percentages indicating a decrease in thickness.

Percent Change of Buccal Bone Thickness as Assessed by the Cone Beam Computer Tomography at 5 mm From the Implant Platform6 months post implantation

The buccal bone thickness (BBT) was measured using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The percentage change in BBT was calculated by comparing the post-implant measurements to baseline values, with positive percentages indicating an increase in thickness and negative percentages indicating a decrease in thickness.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath