Comparison of Standard Opioid Prescription Versus Prescription Guided by Pharmacogenetic Analysis in Patients With Non-cancerous Chronic Pain.
- Conditions
- Non-cancerous Chronic Pain
- Interventions
- Other: Standard opioid prescriptionOther: Pharmacogenetic analysis allowing personalized opioid prescription
- Registration Number
- NCT03498014
- Lead Sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
- Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesize that opioid prescription guided by patient pharmacogenetic profile will diminish opioid-associated undesirable effects by 50% and improve medication compliance.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
- The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
- The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient is at least 18 years old
- The patient will be available for all visits
- Patients suffer from non-cancerous chronic pain according to HAS criteria
- Patient not having taking opioids in previous 2 months
- Patient indicated for prescription of opioids (oxycodone, codeine or tramadol) or patient not responding to first line treatment
- The subject is participating in an category I interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
- The subject refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to give the subject informed information
- The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
- The patient is pregnant or breastfeeding
- The patient is likely to procreate and does not use an effective method of contraception (contraceptive ring, surgical contraception, implant, patch, contraceptive pill, male and female condoms, IUD)
- There is a contra-indication for opioid use
- Patient with an addiction risk (score ≥ 8 on ORT scale).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Prescription as standard Standard opioid prescription - Pharmacogenetic-guided prescription Pharmacogenetic analysis allowing personalized opioid prescription -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Compare presence/absence undesirable events associated to opioid between groups from predefined list Month 3 Presence/absence of at least one undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to list in Annex 17.5 of the protocol
Compare presence/absence undesirable events associated to opioid between groups Month 3 Presence/absence of at least one undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of undesirable events associated to opioid between groups Month 3 Total number of undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
Compare benefit/risk ratio of treatment between groups Month 3 Overall Benefit of Analgesics Score (OBAS); score between 0-32
Compare quality of life between patients in each group Month 3 Quality of life Short Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire; score between 0-100
Qualitive comparison of medication compliance between groups Month 3 Presence/absence of opioids or metabolites in serum
Compare patient-reported pain between groups Month 3 Visual analog scare 1-10
Compare neuropathic pain between groups Month 3 DN4 score (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions); score between 0-10
Correlation between predicted phenotype and observed metabolic ratios Month 3 Products/substrate ratio measured by high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC-HRMS)
Metabolic profile of patients Month 3 Extensive Metaboliser, Intermediate Metaboliser, Poor Metaboliser or Ultra-rapid Metaboliser according to CYP2D6 phenotype and polymorphism of the glucuronyl transferase gene UGT2B7
Correlation between saliva and plasma concentration of opioids Month 3 Concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS)
Compare medication compliance between groups Month 3 Serum concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS)
Compare observed medication misuse between groups Month 3 Prescription Opioid Misuse Index (POMI)
Compare clinical therapeutic efficacy between groups Month 3 Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score; value between 1-7
Serum concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) Day 0 Opioids Risk Tool (ORT): scores of 0-3 (low risk), 4-7 (moderate risk), or ≥ 8 (high risk)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
CHU Nimes
🇫🇷Nîmes, France