MedPath

Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Retinal Detachment Surgery

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Retinal Detachment
Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy
Interventions
Procedure: Control group
Procedure: Intervention group
Registration Number
NCT05538156
Lead Sponsor
Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Brief Summary

Despite advances in surgical techniques over the recent decades, proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) remains the main obstacle to successful rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair, accounting for nearly 75% of all primary surgical failures. It is characterized by the growth and contraction of cellular membranes within the vitreous cavity and on both surfaces of the detached retina as well as intraretinal fibrosis.

The Retina Society classification, modified in 1991 and currently the most widely used, divided PVR into three grades. Grade A is limited to the presence of vitreous haze and pigment clumps. Grade B includes rolled or irregular edges of tear and/or inner retinal surface wrinkling with possible retinal stiffness and vessel tortuosity. Grade C is defined as the presence of full-thickness fixed retinal folds and is further subdivided based on the number of hours involved and the location.

Recently, Foveau et al., in a retrospective comparative case series, have demonstrated that performing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling during RRD surgery may increase the anatomical success rate for this indication.

The aim of this multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ILM peeling on surgical outcomes in patients with primary macula-off RRD complicated by grade B PVR.

Detailed Description

Despite advances in surgical techniques over the recent decades, proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) remains the main obstacle to successful rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair, accounting for nearly 75% of all primary surgical failures. It is characterized by the growth and contraction of cellular membranes within the vitreous cavity and on both surfaces of the detached retina as well as intraretinal fibrosis.

The Retina Society classification, modified in 1991 and currently the most widely used, divided PVR into three grades. Grade A is limited to the presence of vitreous haze and pigment clumps. Grade B includes rolled or irregular edges of tear and/or inner retinal surface wrinkling with possible retinal stiffness and vessel tortuosity. Grade C is defined as the presence of full-thickness fixed retinal folds and is further subdivided based on the number of hours involved and the location.

Grade B PVR is thought to represent an immature form of PVR with a definite potential for progression to further stages of PVR. Specific treatment for moderate PVR seems to be essential to halt the disease process and to reduce the risk of postoperative re-detachment. However, there is currently no consensus regarding the management of grade PVR. In macula-off RRD, vitrectomy with gas tamponade is often used as a primary option, with a retinal reattachment rate of 60%.

Recently, Foveau et al., in a retrospective comparative case series, have demonstrated that performing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling during RRD surgery may increase the anatomical success rate for this indication.

The aim of this multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ILM peeling on surgical outcomes in patients with primary macula-off RRD complicated by grade B PVR.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
126
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients older than 18 years old
  • With macula-off retinal detachment complicated by grade B proliferative vitreoretinopathy
Exclusion Criteria
  • Underage patients
  • History of retinal detachment
  • History of intraocular surgery (except for cataract surgery)
  • Traumatic retinal detachment
  • Macular hole-associated retinal detachment
  • Concurrent macular disease (diabetic maculopathy, age-related macular degeneration)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Control groupControl groupThe internal limiting membrane is not removed
Intervention groupIntervention groupThe internal limiting membrane of the posterior pole is removed
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Primary anatomical success rate12 months after surgery

Primary retinal reattachment rate

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Functional outcomes #212 months after surgery

Degree of metamorphopsia (M-CHARTS)

Anatomical outcomes #212 months after surgery

Incidence of epiretinal membrane

Functional outcomes #112 months after surgery

Visual acuity (Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution)

Anatomical outcomes #112 months after surgery

Integrity of the photoreceptor layer on Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

Anatomical outcomes #312 months after surgery

Incidence of cystoid macular edema

Anatomical outcomes #412 months after surgery

Incidence of DONFL appearance

Functional outcomes #312 months after surgery

Retinal sensitivity on microperimetry testing

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath