Real-Time Ultrasound–Guided Versus Ultrasound-Assisted Spinal Anesthesia in patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic Surgery. A prospective, randomized, single-blind, comparative study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2/3 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 92
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To compare the first attempt success rate of Ultrasound-assisted versus Real-time ultrasound guided spinal anaesthesia
研究概览
简要总结
Spinal anaesthesia is traditionally performed using the landmark technique. Despite the spinous processes being reliable surface anatomical landmarks in many patients, they are not always easily recognized. Multiple needle attempts may lead to a higher incidence of complications. Ultrasonography scanning has shown better puncture success rates, shorten puncture time and greater efficacy and safety of spinal anaesthesia. Techniques such as Ultrasound assisted (USAS) and Real-time guided ultrasound (USRTG) can be used to facilitate the same.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 70.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients scheduled for lower limb orthopaedic surgeries with spinal anaesthesia 18 to 70 years of age.
- •ASA I to III.
排除标准
- •Patients with severe cardiopulmonary diseases.
- •Patients with contraindications of spinal anaesthesia.
- •Patients unwilling to participate in the study.
结局指标
主要结局
To compare the first attempt success rate of Ultrasound-assisted versus Real-time ultrasound guided spinal anaesthesia
时间窗: Parameters will be assessed at baseline.
techniques in patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgeries.
时间窗: Parameters will be assessed at baseline.
次要结局
- To compare the first-pass success rate,number of attempts, number of passes, procedure time, &(complications in Ultrasound-assisted versus Real-time ultarsound guided spinal anaesthesia techniques.)
研究者
Neha Hatkar
HBTMC AND DR R.N.COOPER HOSPITAL, VILE PARLE WEST, 400056