Comparing the proportion of hypoxia in sedated adults undergoing OGD using TCI propofol versus intermittent boluses
- Conditions
- Respiratoryhypoxia
- Registration Number
- PACTR201708002325400
- Lead Sponsor
- The Aga Khan University, Nairobi
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 176
All ASA I and II adults aged 18 - 65 years scheduled to undergo non-emergent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy under sedation.
¿Known allergy to propofol, midazolam, soybean, egg.
¿Active respiratory tract infection.
¿History or indicator of large airway compromise e.g. obstructive sleep apnoea, COPD, presence of stridor, or known history of difficult bag-valve-mask ventilation.
¿Patients requiring additional types of sedative agents to achieve optimal sedation.
¿History of chronic exposure to sedative medication.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the proportion of hypoxia between the two study groups
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the proportion of hypotension and bradycardia between the two study groups