NCT01917266
Completed
N/A
Evaluation of Left Ventricular (LV) Lead Positioning Using MediGuide
ConditionsHeart Failure
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Sponsor
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Enrollment
- 40
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Percent of patients with the left ventricle (LV) lead implanted at the site of latest mechanical activation
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 7 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy(CRT) response in subjects with concordant versus discordant left ventricular (LV) lead position as compared to the site of latest mechanical activation.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Be scheduled to undergo implant of a Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) system with approved standard indication per accepted guidelines as a new implant or an upgrade from an existing Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or pacemaker with no prior left ventricular lead placement
- •Be in sinus rhythm at the time of enrollment
- •Have the ability to provide informed consent for study participation and be willing and able to comply with the Clinical Investigational Plan described evaluations
Exclusion Criteria
- •Have persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation
- •Be in New York Heart Association (NYHA) IV functional class
- •Have prior left ventricular (LV) lead implant
- •Be pacemaker-dependent
- •Have a recent myocardial infarction within 40 days prior to enrollment
- •Have undergone cardiac bypass surgery or coronary revascularization procedure within 3 months prior to enrollment or be scheduled for such procedures in the following 7 months
- •Have had a recent Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 3 months prior to enrollment
- •Have had intravenous inotropic support in the last 30 days
- •Exhibit Cheyne-Stokes respiration
- •Be less than 18 years of age
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Percent of patients with the left ventricle (LV) lead implanted at the site of latest mechanical activation
Time Frame: This outcome measure will be assessed after an off-line analysis immediately after implant
Secondary Outcomes
- Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) as defined by percent change in end-systolic volume (ESV) at 6-month follow-up relative to baseline.(6 months after implant)
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
N/A
CRT Implant Strategy Using the Longest Electrical Delay for Non-left Bundle Branch Block PatientsNon-left Bundle Branch BlockIschemic or Non-ischemic CardiomyopathyNCT01983293Abbott Medical Devices248
Unknown
N/A
Optimal Left Ventricular Lead Positioning During Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy; Comparison of Two Methods of TargetingHeart FailureNCT03769272Peter J Pugh40
Completed
N/A
Left Ventricular Lead Position in Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyHeart FailureNCT00748735RWTH Aachen University55
Withdrawn
N/A
Endocardial Pacing in On-table Non-responders in Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyHeart FailureNCT01193712Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
Unknown
N/A
Right Ventricular Resynchronization TherapyRight Ventricular FailureChronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary HypertensionPulmonary HypertensionNCT01163422Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)20