Chronic Low Back Pain Graded - Exposure Psychoeducation Intervention
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Non-interactive PsychoeducationBehavioral: Interactive - Psychoeducation
- Registration Number
- NCT03909048
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Brief Summary
This study will examine the effectiveness of one of two psychoeducation treatments on chronic low back pain.
- Detailed Description
This study will examine the effectiveness of one of two psychoeducation treatments on chronic low back pain. Participants will be randomized to one of these two treatments.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- report having low back pain for more than three months and at least half the days in the past 6 months
- be 18-65 years of age,
- have scores higher than 37 on the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia,
- medical conditions other than back pain that significantly impair movement (e.g., arthritis)
- confirmed/suspected pregnancy
- pending litigation related to an episode of low back pain
- significant impairment in vision
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Psycho-education Non-interactive Psychoeducation Non-interactive psycho-education not using interactive dashboard. Interactive Psycho-education Interactive - Psychoeducation Interactive psycho-education using interactive dashboard.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Daily Pain Monitoring: 10 point scale Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment) Daily pain monitoring defined as daily pain intensity and daily pain interference monitoring is two questions asked daily on a 10 point scale assessing daily pain and how much pain had interfered with day to day activities.
Pain: Over the past 24 hours, how would you rate your back pain on average? (0=No Pain; 10=Worst Imaginable Pain)
Interference: Over the past 24 hours, how much did pain interfere with your day-to-day activities? (0=No Interference; 10 = A great deal of interference)"Pain Intensity as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment) The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) measures pain intensity measured via 0-10 numeric rating scale.
0 = No Pain - 10 = Worst Possible Pain Range of scores: 0-10Present Pain Intensity Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment) Present Pain Intensity (PPI) assesses present pain intensity on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 5 (excruciating)
Present Pain Rating Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment) Pain Rating Index (PRI) is assessed by 15 questions assessing pain in the sensory and affective dimensions.
Items rate from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) on degree to which the words apply to pain.
Score Range: 0-45Pain Chronicity assessed by the Graded Chronic Pain Scale Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment) Pain Chronicity is assessed by the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS). The GCPS is 7 questions with 3 sub-scales (Characteristic pain intensity, disability score, and disability points).
Scoring:
Characteristic Pain Intensity: is a 0 to 100 score derived from Questions 1 through 3: Mean (Pain Right Now, Worst Pain, Average Pain) X 10.
Disability Score: is 0 to 100 score derived from Questions 4 through 6: Mean (Daily Activities, Social Activities, Work Activities) X 10 Disability Points: Add the indicated points for Disability Days (Question 7) and for Disability Score (0-6).
Items rate from 0 to 10 with 0 referencing no pain/interference/change and 10 referencing pain as bad as could be/unable to carry out any activities/extreme change.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Back Disability as assessed by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment) The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) assesses disability due to low back pain.
The RMDQ is a 24 item survey with yes/no response options. Score 0 -24 with ower scores indicate more impairment.Daily intervention feedback questions Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment) The daily intervention feedback questions are 7 items that assess the individuals feelings and experiences during that daily intervention session.
0-10 Likert scale
Each item is it's own scale.
Higher scores indicate more enjoyment/usefulness/demand/awareness/concern/mood.Depressive symptoms as assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment) The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20 item survey tool. The items are a 4 pt Likert response items.
Scores range from 0-60 with higher scores indicate greater levels of depressive symptoms.Pain Catastrophizing as assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment) The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a 13 item survey assessing catastrophizing in context to pain. There are 13 items with 5-pt Likert responses.
There are several subscales. Scoring Procedure: The PCS total score is computed by summing responses to all 13 items (0-52).
Subscales:
Rumination: Sum of items 8, 9, 10, 11 (0-16). Magnification: Sum of items 6, 7, 13 (0-12). Helplessness: Sum of items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12 (0-24).Video Game Preferences as assessed by the BrainHex Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment) Video game preferences will be assessed by the BrainHex. The BrainHex provides a tool for designing gameplay and understanding motivations for play.
Mood and Affect as assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Scale Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment) The Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) measures mood of participants. This is a 20 item survey with 5 pt Likert response indicating to what degree the participant feels those emotions. There is a positive and negative subscale.
Higher positive affect score indicates greater positive emotions; higher negative affect score indicates greater negative emotions.
Range of Scores: 0-40Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by the Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment) The Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire (USE, Lund, 2001) measures the subjective usability of a product or service. It is a 30-item survey that examines four dimensions of usability: usefulness, ease of use, ease of learning, and satisfaction. This metric can be applied to various scenarios of usability assessment because it is non-proprietary and technology-agnostic. is a 30 item survey.
Each item is presented on a 7-point Likert scale from strongly disagree = 1 to strongly agree. = 7
Each subscale is calculated by averaging all items in subscale. Usefulness: items 1-8 Ease of use: items 9-19 Ease of Learning: items 20-23 Satisfaction: items 24-30
Range of scores for each subscale: 1-7 Scoring Interpretation: Higher score indicates greater usefulness, satisfaction, and ease of use.Immersive Tendencies Baseline only Immersive Tendencies are assessed by the Immersive Tendencies Questionnaire (ITQ). This is an 18-item survey. Item responses use a 7 point Likert scale. Subscales include: focus, involvement, emotions, and play. Each subscale is scored by summing items. A total score is scored by summing all items.
Range of total score: 18-126 Focus range of scores: 5-35 Involvement range of scores: 5-35 Emotions range of scores: 4-28 Play range of scores: 3-21 Higher scores indicate higher immersive tendencies overall and in each sub-scale.Absorption Tendencies Baseline Only Tellegen Absorption Scale is a 34-item multi-dimensional measure that assesses imaginative involvement and the tendency to become mentally absorbed in everyday activities. Item responses are on a 5-point Likert scale. Items are summed to score.
Range of scores: 0-136. Higher scores indicate greater levels of absorption.Video Game History Baseline Only History of playing video games.
Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by the Modified Treatment Evaluation Inventory Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment) Patient treatment evaluation is assessed by Treatment Evaluation Inventory. This is a 9 item scale with a 5-point Likert responses for each question. The items are scored by summing all items.
Range of scores: 9-45. A higher score indicates greater acceptance of treatment.Pain-related fear of movement as assessed by the Tampa Scale Kinesiophobia Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment) The Tampa Scale Kinesiophobia (TSK) is a 17 item assessment of fear of movement. This uses a 5-pt Likert scale from 1 = Strongly Disagree to 4 = Strongly Agree.
Scoring Procedure: Sum items Range: 17-68 Subscale Harm/Somatic Items: 3, 5, 6, 9, 11, 15 Subscale Avoidance Items: 1, 2, 7, 10, 13, 14, 17Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by the Patient Global Impression of Change Scale Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment) Patient treatment evaluation is assessed by the Patient Global Impression of Change. This is a one item 7 point Likert item assessing improvement of the participants overall status.
Item responses:
1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worsePatient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by Semi-structured Qualitative interviewing Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment) Patient treatment evaluation is assessed by semi-structured interviewing. Qualitative feedback from participant experience will be assessed by thematic analyses.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States