MedPath

Periotome Versus Peizotome as an Aid of Atraumatic Extraction.

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Dental Extraction
Dental Implant
Interventions
Device: Piezotome
Device: Periotome
Registration Number
NCT04915443
Lead Sponsor
Qassim University
Brief Summary

This study aims to compare between periotome and piezotome in terms of efficiency and durability in procedures of simple extractions as an alternative atraumatic extraction technique.

Detailed Description

Teeth extraction is one of the commonly preformed procedures in the dental clinics, and one of the most important precautions followed during the different techniques of teeth extraction is tissue preservation and the avoidance of tissue trauma. So, for the preservation of bone and tissues integrity and elimination of post operative pain and discomfort, atraumatic extraction techniques are presented.

A claim has risen that due to its thin tips which is inserted vertically to the PDL avoiding the leveraging forces caused by conventional elevators, Periotome will aid in the reduction of soft tissue injury and the preservation of bone integrity. While Piezotome which is a newer and innovative device using ultrasonic vibrations mainly for the purpose of osteotomy is considered very efficient due to its selective cutting and being inert against soft tissues, including nerves and blood vessels. leading to lesser cell necrosis and faster bone regeneration providing a minimally invasive atraumatic extraction technique.

And with the rapid development of implantology and painless dentistry, the demands on more efficient, minimally invasive and more durable atraumatic extraction techniques has increased.

This study aims to compare between periotome and piezotome in terms of efficiency and durability in procedures of simple extractions as an alternative atraumatic extraction technique.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
19
Inclusion Criteria
  • Grade I or II patients according to ASA
  • Teeth indicated for simple extraction
  • Teeth indicated for extraction and immediate implant placement
  • Teeth of grade 0-I Mobility
  • Remaining roots with sound form
Exclusion Criteria
  • Grade III-VI patients according to ASA

  • Mobility Grade β‰₯ II

  • Teeth indicated for surgical extraction

    • ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System 2020

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Piezotome GroupPiezotomeAn Atraumatic simple extraction procedure is done to teeth or roots with sound form indicated for simple extraction using SOLO LED PIEZOTOME Kit with ESSENTIAL tips from SATELEC ACTEON.
Periotome GroupPeriotomeAn Atraumatic simple extraction procedure is done to teeth or roots with sound form indicated for simple extraction using H.ZEPF 26.182.13 \& 26.182.11 periotome instrument.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Operative DurationFrom the beginning of extraction tell the delivery of the tooth out from the socket. From the beginning of intervention up to 60 minutes

To compare the operative duration of simple extraction between "Periotome" and "Piezotome" in (minutes).

Gingival LacerationAt the end of the extraction procedure up to 60 minutes

To identify the presence or absence of gingival laceration in the extraction area Immediately after the completion of the extraction procedures (yes/no).

Analgesics Intake8 hours following the intervention tell the 7th day.

To calculate the dosage (in mg) of analgesics intake by the patient after the two procedures. The patient is asked to record his/her analgesics intake daily by dose and in the first 7 days following the procedure.

Operative PainFrom the beginning of extraction tell the delivery of the tooth out from the socket. From the beginning of intervention up to 60 minutes

To evaluate operative pain felt by the patient during the two procedures using (visual analogue scale). The patient is asked after the procedure to give a pain score (using visual analogue scale) to evaluate his/her pain during the procedure.

0= no pain (best outcome) 10= unberable pain (worst outcome)

Post-Operative Pain8 hours following the Procedure tell the 7th day.

To evaluate post-operative pain felt by the patient after the two procedures using (visual analogue scale). The patient is asked after the procedure to give a pain score (using visual analogue scale) to evaluate his/her pain following the procedure in the following order: (1st day, 2nd day, 3rd day and 7th day) from the completion of the procedure.

0= no pain (best outcome) 10= unberable pain (worst outcome)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Qassim Unversity Dental Clinics

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¦

Buraidah, Saudi Arabia

Β© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath