跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04915443
NCT04915443已完成不适用

Periotome Versus Peizotome as an Aid of Atraumatic Extraction.

Qassim University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 19 人开始时间: 2019年12月2日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
19
试验地点
1
主要终点
Operative Duration

研究概览

简要总结

This study aims to compare between periotome and piezotome in terms of efficiency and durability in procedures of simple extractions as an alternative atraumatic extraction technique.

详细描述

Teeth extraction is one of the commonly preformed procedures in the dental clinics, and one of the most important precautions followed during the different techniques of teeth extraction is tissue preservation and the avoidance of tissue trauma. So, for the preservation of bone and tissues integrity and elimination of post operative pain and discomfort, atraumatic extraction techniques are presented.

A claim has risen that due to its thin tips which is inserted vertically to the PDL avoiding the leveraging forces caused by conventional elevators, Periotome will aid in the reduction of soft tissue injury and the preservation of bone integrity. While Piezotome which is a newer and innovative device using ultrasonic vibrations mainly for the purpose of osteotomy is considered very efficient due to its selective cutting and being inert against soft tissues, including nerves and blood vessels. leading to lesser cell necrosis and faster bone regeneration providing a minimally invasive atraumatic extraction technique.

And with the rapid development of implantology and painless dentistry, the demands on more efficient, minimally invasive and more durable atraumatic extraction techniques has increased.

This study aims to compare between periotome and piezotome in terms of efficiency and durability in procedures of simple extractions as an alternative atraumatic extraction technique.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 62 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Grade I or II patients according to ASA
  • Teeth indicated for simple extraction
  • Teeth indicated for extraction and immediate implant placement
  • Teeth of grade 0-I Mobility
  • Remaining roots with sound form

排除标准

  • Grade III-VI patients according to ASA
  • Mobility Grade ≥ II
  • Teeth indicated for surgical extraction
  • ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System 2020

结局指标

主要结局

Operative Duration

时间窗: From the beginning of extraction tell the delivery of the tooth out from the socket. From the beginning of intervention up to 60 minutes

To compare the operative duration of simple extraction between "Periotome" and "Piezotome" in (minutes).

Gingival Laceration

时间窗: At the end of the extraction procedure up to 60 minutes

To identify the presence or absence of gingival laceration in the extraction area Immediately after the completion of the extraction procedures (yes/no).

Analgesics Intake

时间窗: 8 hours following the intervention tell the 7th day.

To calculate the dosage (in mg) of analgesics intake by the patient after the two procedures. The patient is asked to record his/her analgesics intake daily by dose and in the first 7 days following the procedure.

Operative Pain

时间窗: From the beginning of extraction tell the delivery of the tooth out from the socket. From the beginning of intervention up to 60 minutes

To evaluate operative pain felt by the patient during the two procedures using (visual analogue scale). The patient is asked after the procedure to give a pain score (using visual analogue scale) to evaluate his/her pain during the procedure. 0= no pain (best outcome) 10= unberable pain (worst outcome)

Post-Operative Pain

时间窗: 8 hours following the Procedure tell the 7th day.

To evaluate post-operative pain felt by the patient after the two procedures using (visual analogue scale). The patient is asked after the procedure to give a pain score (using visual analogue scale) to evaluate his/her pain following the procedure in the following order: (1st day, 2nd day, 3rd day and 7th day) from the completion of the procedure. 0= no pain (best outcome) 10= unberable pain (worst outcome)

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mohammed Alraqibah

Principal Investigator

Qassim University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Periotome Versus Peizotome as an Aid of Atraumatic... | 临床试验