Management of Miller Class I & II Gingival Recession
- Conditions
- Gingival Recession
- Interventions
- Procedure: coronally advanced flap with abrasive de-epithelized graft.Procedure: coronally advanced flap with de-epithelized graft.
- Registration Number
- NCT03767309
- Lead Sponsor
- Halla Gamal Mohammed Esmail
- Brief Summary
Management of Miller class I \& II gingival recession using coronally advanced flap combined with conventional de-epithelialized free gingival graft versus coronally advanced flap combined with abrasive de-epithelized connective tissue graft Null hypothesis: In patients with Miller class I and II gingival recession, there is no difference between coronally advanced flap with conventional de-epithelialized free gingival graft and coronally advanced flap with abrasive de-epithelized connective tissue graft in recession depth reduction.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Systemically healthy patients.
- Miller's Class I and II recession defects with recession depth ≥ 2mm.
- Presence of identifiable cemento-enamel junction (CEJ).
- Clinical indication and/or patient request for recession coverage.
- Smoking ≤ 10 cigarettes/day.
- Cooperative patients able and accept to come for follow up appointments.
- Pregnant females.
- Smoking ˃ 10 cigarettes/day.
- Contraindication for periodontal surgery.
- Patients with poor oral hygiene.
- Recession defects associated with caries or restoration as well as
- Teeth with evidence of a pulpal pathology
- Molar teeth
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Test group coronally advanced flap with abrasive de-epithelized graft. SCTG will be harvested from the palate in the intervention group (coronally advanced flap and abrasively de-epithelialized free gingival graft) Control group coronally advanced flap with de-epithelized graft. SCTG will be harvested from the palate using Zucchilli's technique (zucchelli, 2010) in the control group (coronally advanced flap and conventionally de-epithelialized free gingival graft)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Direct Post-operative pain 7 days Directly will be evaluated post-surgically with Visual Analogue Scale with numbers from 0 to 10 that given to the patients at 7 days follow-up visits.
Indirect Post-operative pain 7 days Indirectly will be evaluated on the basis of the mean consumption of analgesics
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Root Coverage Esthetic Score 6 months The RES system evaluates five variables 6 months following surgery
Surgical chair time at the time of surgery measured by Stop watch
Complete Root Coverage 6 months CRC evaluated in patients by single operator clinically using a periodontal probe. Root coverage was deemed complete when the gingival margin is at or above the level of CEJ
Recession depth. 6 months Measured from the CEJ to the most apical extension of the gingival margin
Gingival Recession Width 6 months measured at the level of the CEJ.
Width Of Keratinized Gingiva 6 months Measured from the gingival margin to the mucogingival line
Gingival thickness 6 months It will be measured by penetrating the gingiva mid-buccally in the attached gingiva, half way between mucogingival junction and free gingival groove with the periodontal probe after giving local anesthesia to measure the thickness of gingival tissues.