Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/EUCTR2008-001491-77-SE
EUCTR2008-001491-77-SE
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable

Randomized study comparing spinal anealgesia compared with epidural analgesia durinmg and postoperative nephrectomy dua to renal cell carcinoma

Prof. Ola Winsö, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Norrlands University Hospiatal0 sitesApril 16, 2010
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsPostoperative pain and mobilization after radical or nephronsparing nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinomaMedDRA version: 13.1Level: LLTClassification code 10036236Term: Postoperative pain reliefSystem Organ Class: 10042613 - Surgical and medical proceduresTherapeutic area: Diseases [C] - Cancer [C04]
DrugsCatapresanMarcain spinal tung 5 mg/mlMarcain adrenalin 2,5 mg/ml + 5 ug/mlFentalyl 50 ug/mlMorfin Special

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Postoperative pain and mobilization after radical or nephronsparing nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma
Sponsor
Prof. Ola Winsö, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Norrlands University Hospiatal
Status
Active, not recruiting
Last Updated
14 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
April 16, 2010
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
14 years ago
Study Type
Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Prof. Ola Winsö, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Norrlands University Hospiatal

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients planned to perform nephrectomy due to renal cell carcinoma, having a ASA score between I and III.
  • •Are the trial subjects under 18? no
  • •Number of subjects for this age range:
  • •F.1\.2 Adults (18\-64 years) yes
  • •F.1\.2\.1 Number of subjects for this age range
  • •F.1\.3 Elderly (\>\=65 years) yes
  • •F.1\.3\.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Exclusion of patients having a ASA score more than III, or patients having a high risk for bleeding during surgery as vena caval thrombosis; Patients with chronic pain disorders; Patients with any abuse; Patients younger than 18 years old and uncapable of understanding the consent form will not be eligible; Pregnant women or when pregnancy cannot be ruled out; All patients with any contraindication for epidural\- or spinal analgesia will be excluded. As well as patients having a body weight less than 45 kg or more than 120 kg.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Randomised controlled trial comparing the spinal sensory level achieved, duration of action and safety of generic (Bupivacaine 0.5% with Dextrose-PharmaQ) versus original bupivacaine (Macaine 0.5% with dextrose-Adcock Ingram) in spinal anaesthesia
PACTR201807735986564Pireshin Ramdharee72
Completed
Not Applicable
A pilot study comparing general versus spinal anaesthesia for vaginal surgery
ISRCTN76637086niversity Hospital of North Staffordshire (UK)80
Completed
Not Applicable
The randomized study about pain relief after spinal surgery with the conduction block of dorsal rami with Ropivacai
JPRN-UMIN000018702Osaka City Graduate school of Medicine280
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison between three modes of labour analgesiaHealth Condition 1: O80- Encounter for full-term uncomplicated delivery
CTRI/2020/03/024014Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed to be Universty
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparative Evaluation of Spinal Analgesia Versus Epidural Analgesia In Pregnant PatientsANESTHESIA BLOCK AND DELIVERY.Other complications of spinal and epidural anaesthesia during labour and delivery
IRCT2016042927667N1Vice Chancellor for Research, Kermanshah University of Medical Science100